Unpacking the European Commission: <i>Cabinet</i> Composition and EU Policy‐Making

Abstract We examine bureaucratic politics within the European Commission, using novel data on the backgrounds of individual members of Commissioners' cabinets . Although cabinet composition has become increasingly regulated in recent decades, its selection remains a key area for personalised political appointments within an organisation more commonly known for its collective responsibility and lack of individual influence. Using data on the personal and professional backgrounds of cabinet members since the first Barroso Commission, we trace how administrative reforms meant primarily to ‘de‐nationalise’ the selection of appointees have led to changes in cabinet composition. We then explore how cabinet composition impacts on the complexity of Commission proposals and its subsequent inter‐institutional negotiations. We find that whilst more diversity of Commission cabinets clearly enhances the input legitimacy of the EU's legislative process, it neither benefits nor threatens the quality of the Commission's policy proposals or how they are processed politically.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13678
Citations
2
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking the European Commission: Cabinet Composition and EU Policy‐Making

Steffen Hurka, William T. Daniel
2 citations
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
4.46
article

Unpacking the European Commission: Cabinet Composition and EU Policy‐Making

Steffen Hurka, William T. Daniel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We examine bureaucratic politics within the European Commission, using novel data on the backgrounds of individual members of Commissioners' cabinets . Although cabinet composition has become increasingly regulated in recent decades, its selection remains a key area for personalised political appointments within an organisation more commonly known for its collective responsibility and lack of individual influence. Using data on the personal and professional backgrounds of cabinet members since the first Barroso Commission, we trace how administrative reforms meant primarily to ‘de‐nationalise’ the selection of appointees have led to changes in cabinet composition. We then explore how cabinet composition impacts on the complexity of Commission proposals and its subsequent inter‐institutional negotiations. We find that whilst more diversity of Commission cabinets clearly enhances the input legitimacy of the EU's legislative process, it neither benefits nor threatens the quality of the Commission's policy proposals or how they are processed politically.

JCMS Journal of Common Market StudiesVol. 63(3)
University of Nottingham (GB), LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
European Commission, University of Nottingham, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
European Union Policy and Governance
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.