Antinomic normativity: Negative dialectics, moral skepticism, and the problem of the normative foundations of critique

This article attempts to determine Adorno’s stance concerning two opposing positions in the relationship between critique and normativity. Although he rejects the demand to account for the normative foundations of critique, his negative dialectics does not fall back on the alternative of skepticism about normativity, of which it is often accused. I illustrate this problem by recovering the skeptical objections advanced by Justin Evans. Next, I turn to the young Hegel’s interpretation of the positive relationship between his speculative dialectics and skepticism to pose the question of what relationship now exists between negative dialectics and skepticism. The answer is outlined based on a reading of Minima Moralia under the interpretative key of the idea of real normative antinomies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Social Criticism
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537241287232
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antinomic normativity: Negative dialectics, moral skepticism, and the problem of the normative foundations of critique

Luiz Philipe de Caux
1 citations
Philosophy & Social Criticism
Critical Theory and Philosophy
1.13
article

Antinomic normativity: Negative dialectics, moral skepticism, and the problem of the normative foundations of critique

Luiz Philipe de Caux
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article attempts to determine Adorno’s stance concerning two opposing positions in the relationship between critique and normativity. Although he rejects the demand to account for the normative foundations of critique, his negative dialectics does not fall back on the alternative of skepticism about normativity, of which it is often accused. I illustrate this problem by recovering the skeptical objections advanced by Justin Evans. Next, I turn to the young Hegel’s interpretation of the positive relationship between his speculative dialectics and skepticism to pose the question of what relationship now exists between negative dialectics and skepticism. The answer is outlined based on a reading of Minima Moralia under the interpretative key of the idea of real normative antinomies.

Philosophy & Social CriticismVol. 52(2)
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Critical Theory and Philosophy
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Antinomic normativity: Negative dialectics, moral skepticism, and the problem of the normative foundations of critique — Luiz Philipe de Caux · Philosophy & Social Criticism (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS