An Assessment of the Lateral Selective Etching, with HCl, of High Versus Low Ge Content SiGe Layers

We have evaluated the feasibility of selectively etching, with gaseous HCl, high versus low Ge content SiGe layers. To that end, we have grown {20 to 25 nm thick Si / ~ 12-15 nm thick Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 or Si 0.75 Ge 0.25 / ~ 11-14 nm thick Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 } multilayers on SOI substrates. After a low temperature capping with SiN, such stacks were patterned into regular arrays of square mesas or lines with a stop on the buried oxide, to laterally etch the layers of interest. We first determined, at 500°C, 600 Torr, the (001) blanket HCl etch rates of SiGe 30% and 40%: 1.4 and 5.3 nm min. -1 . We then switched over to patterned wafers. The lateral selective etching of Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 versus Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 (and Si) was feasible and the following features highlighted: (i) Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 lateral etch rates along the <110> directions were much smaller than in the vertical [001] direction and (ii) because of micro-loading, lateral etch rates were definitely higher for squares than for lines (0.9-1.1 nm min. -1 for lines, to be compared with 1.7–2.1 nm min. -1 for squares). Meanwhile, the lateral selective etching of Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 versus Si 0.75 Ge 0.25 was far from being perfect, with much higher Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 etch rates and a significant Si 0.75 Ge 0.25 recessing at tunnel entrances. Si 0.75 Ge 0.25 floors and ceilings were otherwise far more etched and thus tilted than Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 ones. Inserting very thin Si spacers between Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 cores and Si 0.75 Ge 0.25 claddings partly solved those issues, with no recessing and lesser etchings at the entry points of tunnels.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ECS Transactions
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1149/11402.0055ecst
Citations
2
Primary Topic
3D IC and TSV technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Assessment of the Lateral Selective Etching, with HCl, of High Versus Low Ge Content SiGe Layers

Pattamon Dezest, Olivier Glorieux, F. Aussenac, B. Prévitali et al.
2 citations
ECS Transactions
3D IC and TSV technologies
0.42
article

An Assessment of the Lateral Selective Etching, with HCl, of High Versus Low Ge Content SiGe Layers

Pattamon Dezest, Olivier Glorieux, F. Aussenac, B. Prévitali, Sylvain Barraud, Adrien Blot-Saby, Ludovic Couture, Jean-Michel Hartmann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We have evaluated the feasibility of selectively etching, with gaseous HCl, high versus low Ge content SiGe layers. To that end, we have grown {20 to 25 nm thick Si / ~ 12-15 nm thick Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 or Si 0.75 Ge 0.25 / ~ 11-14 nm thick Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 } multilayers on SOI substrates. After a low temperature capping with SiN, such stacks were patterned into regular arrays of square mesas or lines with a stop on the buried oxide, to laterally etch the layers of interest. We first determined, at 500°C, 600 Torr, the (001) blanket HCl etch rates of SiGe 30% and 40%: 1.4 and 5.3 nm min. -1 . We then switched over to patterned wafers. The lateral selective etching of Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 versus Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 (and Si) was feasible and the following features highlighted: (i) Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 lateral etch rates along the <110> directions were much smaller than in the vertical [001] direction and (ii) because of micro-loading, lateral etch rates were definitely higher for squares than for lines (0.9-1.1 nm min. -1 for lines, to be compared with 1.7–2.1 nm min. -1 for squares). Meanwhile, the lateral selective etching of Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 versus Si 0.75 Ge 0.25 was far from being perfect, with much higher Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 etch rates and a significant Si 0.75 Ge 0.25 recessing at tunnel entrances. Si 0.75 Ge 0.25 floors and ceilings were otherwise far more etched and thus tilted than Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 ones. Inserting very thin Si spacers between Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 cores and Si 0.75 Ge 0.25 claddings partly solved those issues, with no recessing and lesser etchings at the entry points of tunnels.

ECS TransactionsVol. 114(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
3D IC and TSV technologies
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.