Access to Water Service Modalities in Rural Alaska: Understanding Community Experiences and Perceptions

Households in rural Alaska rely on various water service modalities to meet daily needs. The level of service provided impacts end-users’ ability to access and benefit from their services. Furthermore, the degree of responsibility placed on end-users for the collection, storage, and maintenance of systems varies by water service modality. Centering end-users’ experiences and preferences in water management helps ensure that water infrastructure solutions align with community needs, priorities, and capabilities. To that end, we compare end-users’ experiences with different water service modalities and perceptions of service in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, one of the most underserved regions in the United States. We then explore associations between experiences and sociodemographic and geographic community characteristics to identify potential inequities or factors impacting end-users’ access to water. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of 41 semistructured interviews with 50 end-users residing in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. Findings show that end-users frequently struggle with service disruptions and affordability, especially hauled water users. End-users also expressed aesthetic concerns related to the taste of chlorinated water, leading them to use potentially unsafe water service modalities for consumption. Better understanding of public perceptions allows us to center community needs when improving access to water services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00582
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to Water Service Modalities in Rural Alaska: Understanding Community Experiences and Perceptions

Leif Albertson, Michaela LaPatin, Lauryn A. Spearing, Prachi Mehendale et al.
4 citations
ACS ES&T Water
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
3.40
article

Access to Water Service Modalities in Rural Alaska: Understanding Community Experiences and Perceptions

Leif Albertson, Michaela LaPatin, Lauryn A. Spearing, Prachi Mehendale, Kasey M. Faust, Daniel Erian Armanios, Lynn E. Katz, Nicola Ritsch, Miriam Tariq
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Households in rural Alaska rely on various water service modalities to meet daily needs. The level of service provided impacts end-users’ ability to access and benefit from their services. Furthermore, the degree of responsibility placed on end-users for the collection, storage, and maintenance of systems varies by water service modality. Centering end-users’ experiences and preferences in water management helps ensure that water infrastructure solutions align with community needs, priorities, and capabilities. To that end, we compare end-users’ experiences with different water service modalities and perceptions of service in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, one of the most underserved regions in the United States. We then explore associations between experiences and sociodemographic and geographic community characteristics to identify potential inequities or factors impacting end-users’ access to water. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of 41 semistructured interviews with 50 end-users residing in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. Findings show that end-users frequently struggle with service disruptions and affordability, especially hauled water users. End-users also expressed aesthetic concerns related to the taste of chlorinated water, leading them to use potentially unsafe water service modalities for consumption. Better understanding of public perceptions allows us to center community needs when improving access to water services.

ACS ES&T WaterVol. 4(10)
Tufts University (US), University of Alaska Fairbanks (US), University of Oxford (GB), Carnegie Mellon University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.