‘I leave most of the decisions up to her:’ Gendered parenting, un/equal decision work, and responsibility for COVID-19 vaccination

Vaccination scholarship focuses on how privilege, individualized choice and ‘intensive’ and ‘natural’ parenthood – often motherhood – lead people to delay or not vaccinate their children. Recently, examining parents’ vaccination responsibilities – and the inequalities in paid employment and unpaid care work underpinning them – has become important to understand COVID-19. This article asks who makes vaccination decisions for their children under the age of five, what COVID-19 vaccine decisions are made and how these decisions are gendered. We draw on interviews with 18 Western Australian heterosexual parents. Tracking the responsibilization of mothers and fathers, we contribute a gendered analysis of vaccine ‘decision work.’ We note that norms of intensive parenting led parents to accept or reject vaccines. Like women, men can engage in and support intensive parenting – especially where vaccines are new or widely discussed, or men are available for care work. Overall, we find some potential for children's COVID-19 vaccination to produce more responsibilized fathers and mothers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of sociology
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833241269135
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘I leave most of the decisions up to her:’ Gendered parenting, un/equal decision work, and responsibility for COVID-19 vaccination

Lara McKenzie, Sian Tomkinson, Katie Attwell
4 citations
Journal of sociology
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
2.11
article

‘I leave most of the decisions up to her:’ Gendered parenting, un/equal decision work, and responsibility for COVID-19 vaccination

Lara McKenzie, Sian Tomkinson, Katie Attwell
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Vaccination scholarship focuses on how privilege, individualized choice and ‘intensive’ and ‘natural’ parenthood – often motherhood – lead people to delay or not vaccinate their children. Recently, examining parents’ vaccination responsibilities – and the inequalities in paid employment and unpaid care work underpinning them – has become important to understand COVID-19. This article asks who makes vaccination decisions for their children under the age of five, what COVID-19 vaccine decisions are made and how these decisions are gendered. We draw on interviews with 18 Western Australian heterosexual parents. Tracking the responsibilization of mothers and fathers, we contribute a gendered analysis of vaccine ‘decision work.’ We note that norms of intensive parenting led parents to accept or reject vaccines. Like women, men can engage in and support intensive parenting – especially where vaccines are new or widely discussed, or men are available for care work. Overall, we find some potential for children's COVID-19 vaccination to produce more responsibilized fathers and mothers.

Journal of sociologyVol. 62(1)
The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.