‘I leave most of the decisions up to her:’ Gendered parenting, un/equal decision work, and responsibility for COVID-19 vaccination
Vaccination scholarship focuses on how privilege, individualized choice and ‘intensive’ and ‘natural’ parenthood – often motherhood – lead people to delay or not vaccinate their children. Recently, examining parents’ vaccination responsibilities – and the inequalities in paid employment and unpaid care work underpinning them – has become important to understand COVID-19. This article asks who makes vaccination decisions for their children under the age of five, what COVID-19 vaccine decisions are made and how these decisions are gendered. We draw on interviews with 18 Western Australian heterosexual parents. Tracking the responsibilization of mothers and fathers, we contribute a gendered analysis of vaccine ‘decision work.’ We note that norms of intensive parenting led parents to accept or reject vaccines. Like women, men can engage in and support intensive parenting – especially where vaccines are new or widely discussed, or men are available for care work. Overall, we find some potential for children's COVID-19 vaccination to produce more responsibilized fathers and mothers.
Authors
- Lara McKenzie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6625-0956)
- Sian Tomkinson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8292-106X)
- Katie Attwell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0366-2160)
Institutions
- The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Macquarie University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of sociology
- Published
- 2024-09-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833241269135
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.11