Detection Rate of Fetal Anomalies in Early Mid-Trimester Compared to Late Mid-Trimester Detailed Scans: Possible Implications for First-Trimester Sonography

<b>Objective</b>: A late mid-trimester fetal organ scan (lMTS) is recommended between 18 and 22 weeks of pregnancy. Evidence has been accumulating on the effectiveness of first-trimester anatomy scans. Early mid-trimester fetal scans (eMTSs; 14-17 weeks) may have the advantage of visualization of most organs, hence allowing earlier genetic assessment and decision making. Our aim is to examine the effectiveness of eMTSs in identifying fetal anomalies compared to lMTSs. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective study was conducted based on data from the multidisciplinary prenatal diagnosis clinic in a tertiary center. During the study period (2011-2021), an out-of-pocket eMTS in a community setting was offered routinely to the general population. Women who had previously undergone an eMTS and were later assessed due to a fetal anomaly in our clinic were included in the study. The cohort was divided into two groups according to whether the anomaly had been detected during the eMTS. We then compared the groups for factors that may be associated with anomaly detection in eMTSs. We used t-tests and chi-square tests, for quantitative and qualitative variables, respectively, to determine variables related to eMTS anomaly detection, and logistic regression for multivariate analysis. <b>Results</b>: Of 1525 women assessed in our multidisciplinary clinic, 340 were included in the study. The anomaly detection rate of the eMTS compared to the lMTS was 59.1% The eMTS detection rates for specific organ systems were as follows: skeletal, 57%; cardiac, 52%; congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT), 44%; central nervous system, 32.4%; chest, 33%; and abdominal, 28%. In multivariate analysis, abnormal first-trimester screening (aOR 3.2; 95%CI 1.26-8.08) and multiple anomalies (aOR 1.86; 95%CI 1.02-3.37) were found to be associated with eMTS anomaly detection. <b>Conclusions</b>: The eMTS detection rate was nearly 60% and was most accurate in detecting skeletal, cardiac, and CAKUT anomalies. Since the eMTS was community-based, this rate likely reflects a "real-world" scenario. Our findings support consideration of performing an eMTS or first-trimester scan routinely for earlier diagnosis and decision making, as an adjunctive to lMTSs. Future studies will examine the cost-effectiveness of early scans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195750
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection Rate of Fetal Anomalies in Early Mid-Trimester Compared to Late Mid-Trimester Detailed Scans: Possible Implications for First-Trimester Sonography

Hen Y. Sela, Ari Weiss, Rachel Michaelson‐Cohen, Zangi Yehudit et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
2.22
article

Detection Rate of Fetal Anomalies in Early Mid-Trimester Compared to Late Mid-Trimester Detailed Scans: Possible Implications for First-Trimester Sonography

Hen Y. Sela, Ari Weiss, Rachel Michaelson‐Cohen, Zangi Yehudit, Mazaki Eyal, Shen Ori
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective</b>: A late mid-trimester fetal organ scan (lMTS) is recommended between 18 and 22 weeks of pregnancy. Evidence has been accumulating on the effectiveness of first-trimester anatomy scans. Early mid-trimester fetal scans (eMTSs; 14-17 weeks) may have the advantage of visualization of most organs, hence allowing earlier genetic assessment and decision making. Our aim is to examine the effectiveness of eMTSs in identifying fetal anomalies compared to lMTSs. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective study was conducted based on data from the multidisciplinary prenatal diagnosis clinic in a tertiary center. During the study period (2011-2021), an out-of-pocket eMTS in a community setting was offered routinely to the general population. Women who had previously undergone an eMTS and were later assessed due to a fetal anomaly in our clinic were included in the study. The cohort was divided into two groups according to whether the anomaly had been detected during the eMTS. We then compared the groups for factors that may be associated with anomaly detection in eMTSs. We used t-tests and chi-square tests, for quantitative and qualitative variables, respectively, to determine variables related to eMTS anomaly detection, and logistic regression for multivariate analysis. <b>Results</b>: Of 1525 women assessed in our multidisciplinary clinic, 340 were included in the study. The anomaly detection rate of the eMTS compared to the lMTS was 59.1% The eMTS detection rates for specific organ systems were as follows: skeletal, 57%; cardiac, 52%; congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT), 44%; central nervous system, 32.4%; chest, 33%; and abdominal, 28%. In multivariate analysis, abnormal first-trimester screening (aOR 3.2; 95%CI 1.26-8.08) and multiple anomalies (aOR 1.86; 95%CI 1.02-3.37) were found to be associated with eMTS anomaly detection. <b>Conclusions</b>: The eMTS detection rate was nearly 60% and was most accurate in detecting skeletal, cardiac, and CAKUT anomalies. Since the eMTS was community-based, this rate likely reflects a "real-world" scenario. Our findings support consideration of performing an eMTS or first-trimester scan routinely for earlier diagnosis and decision making, as an adjunctive to lMTSs. Future studies will examine the cost-effectiveness of early scans.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(19)
Shaare Zedek Medical Center (IL)
Shenzhen Metro Group
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
2.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.