Validation of the practicability of logical assessment formula for evaluations with inaccurate ground-truth labels: An application study on tumour segmentation for breast cancer

The logical assessment formula (LAF) is a new theory proposed for evaluations with inaccurate ground-truth labels (IAGTLs) to assess the predictive models for artificial intelligence applications. However, the practicability of LAF for evaluations with IAGTLs has not yet been validated in real-world practice. In this paper, we applied LAF to two tasks of tumour segmentation for breast cancer (TSfBC) in medical histopathology whole slide image analysis (MHWSIA) for evaluations with IAGTLs. Experimental results and analysis show that the LAF-based evaluations with IAGTLs were unable to confidently act like usual evaluations with accurate ground-truth labels on the one easier task of TSfBC while being able to reasonably act like usual evaluations with AGTLs on the other more difficult task of TSfBC. These results and analysis reflect the potential of LAF applied to MHWSIA for evaluations with IAGTLs. This paper presents the first practical validation of LAF for evaluations with IAGTLs in a real-world application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computing and artificial intelligence.
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59400/cai.v2i2.1443
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the practicability of logical assessment formula for evaluations with inaccurate ground-truth labels: An application study on tumour segmentation for breast cancer

Yongquan Yang, Hong Bu
9 citations
Computing and artificial intelligence.
Machine Learning and Data Classification
3.13
article

Validation of the practicability of logical assessment formula for evaluations with inaccurate ground-truth labels: An application study on tumour segmentation for breast cancer

Yongquan Yang, Hong Bu
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The logical assessment formula (LAF) is a new theory proposed for evaluations with inaccurate ground-truth labels (IAGTLs) to assess the predictive models for artificial intelligence applications. However, the practicability of LAF for evaluations with IAGTLs has not yet been validated in real-world practice. In this paper, we applied LAF to two tasks of tumour segmentation for breast cancer (TSfBC) in medical histopathology whole slide image analysis (MHWSIA) for evaluations with IAGTLs. Experimental results and analysis show that the LAF-based evaluations with IAGTLs were unable to confidently act like usual evaluations with accurate ground-truth labels on the one easier task of TSfBC while being able to reasonably act like usual evaluations with AGTLs on the other more difficult task of TSfBC. These results and analysis reflect the potential of LAF applied to MHWSIA for evaluations with IAGTLs. This paper presents the first practical validation of LAF for evaluations with IAGTLs in a real-world application.

Computing and artificial intelligence.Vol. 2(2)
Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validation of the practicability of logical assessment formula for evaluations with inaccurate ground-truth labels: An application study on tumour segmentation for breast cancer — Yongquan Yang, Hong Bu · Computing and artificial intelligence. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS