Pre- and Procedural Factors Influencing the Success of In Vitro Fertilization: Evaluating Embryo Quality and Clinical Pregnancy in Cases of Tubal Factor Infertility

<b>Introduction</b>: While tubal occlusion is a prevalent cause of infertility, accounting for 11-35% of infertility cases among women, there remains a limited understanding of the factors influencing clinical pregnancy following in vitro fertilization (IVF). <b>Methods</b>: In our retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study conducted at a single tertiary center, medical records of women aged 19 to 43 years were analyzed. Logistic regression models were employed to identify the prognostic factors associated with clinical pregnancy after IVF in patients with tubal factor infertility, excluding cases with hydrosalpinx. <b>Results</b>: Data from 219 women diagnosed with tubal occlusion were compared to 1140 cases with non-tubal indication, covering a total of 1359 IVF cycles. A lower maternal age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.89, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and a higher embryo quality (AOR: 1.26, <i>p</i> = 0.01) emerged as important factors in clinical pregnancy in the tubal infertility group. Moreover, a lower maternal (AOR:0.91, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and paternal age (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and favorable semen quality (AOR: 1.32, <i>p</i> = 0.03) were critical determinants in the non-tubal infertility group. BMI was generally higher in tubal infertility patients (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Furthermore, FSH level (AOR: 0.93, <i>p</i> = 0.004), AMH level (<i>p</i> < 0.04), number of embryos transferred (AOR: 2.04, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and embryo quality (AOR: 1.26, <i>p</i> < 0.001) came into prominence only in the non-tubal infertility group. The clinical pregnancy rate (34.2%) of women with tubal occlusion did not differ significantly from those in other forms of infertility undergoing IVF (35.4%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Although tubal infertility is typically anticipated to yield the highest clinical pregnancy rates following IVF, it is crucial to acknowledge that both maternal and paternal characteristics can also significantly impact the outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195754
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre- and Procedural Factors Influencing the Success of In Vitro Fertilization: Evaluating Embryo Quality and Clinical Pregnancy in Cases of Tubal Factor Infertility

Anna Vágvölgyi, János Zádori, Viktor Vedelek, Olga Nagy et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

Pre- and Procedural Factors Influencing the Success of In Vitro Fertilization: Evaluating Embryo Quality and Clinical Pregnancy in Cases of Tubal Factor Infertility

Anna Vágvölgyi, János Zádori, Viktor Vedelek, Olga Nagy, Rita Sinka, Zoltán Kozinszky, Csaba Ékes, Petra Bicskei, Mariann Tábi, Kristóf Bereczki, Noémi Lajkó
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: While tubal occlusion is a prevalent cause of infertility, accounting for 11-35% of infertility cases among women, there remains a limited understanding of the factors influencing clinical pregnancy following in vitro fertilization (IVF). <b>Methods</b>: In our retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study conducted at a single tertiary center, medical records of women aged 19 to 43 years were analyzed. Logistic regression models were employed to identify the prognostic factors associated with clinical pregnancy after IVF in patients with tubal factor infertility, excluding cases with hydrosalpinx. <b>Results</b>: Data from 219 women diagnosed with tubal occlusion were compared to 1140 cases with non-tubal indication, covering a total of 1359 IVF cycles. A lower maternal age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.89, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and a higher embryo quality (AOR: 1.26, <i>p</i> = 0.01) emerged as important factors in clinical pregnancy in the tubal infertility group. Moreover, a lower maternal (AOR:0.91, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and paternal age (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and favorable semen quality (AOR: 1.32, <i>p</i> = 0.03) were critical determinants in the non-tubal infertility group. BMI was generally higher in tubal infertility patients (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Furthermore, FSH level (AOR: 0.93, <i>p</i> = 0.004), AMH level (<i>p</i> < 0.04), number of embryos transferred (AOR: 2.04, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and embryo quality (AOR: 1.26, <i>p</i> < 0.001) came into prominence only in the non-tubal infertility group. The clinical pregnancy rate (34.2%) of women with tubal occlusion did not differ significantly from those in other forms of infertility undergoing IVF (35.4%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Although tubal infertility is typically anticipated to yield the highest clinical pregnancy rates following IVF, it is crucial to acknowledge that both maternal and paternal characteristics can also significantly impact the outcomes.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(19)
University of Szeged (HU)
Szegedi Tudományegyetem
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.