Implementing Wireless Sensor Network Through Machine Learning Techniques

Introduction: A regional WSN of independent SNs collects environmental and physical data. Sensors for specific applications measure light, pressure, temperature, humidity, etc. WSNs can transmit real-time data without infrastructure via radio frequencies. Smart cities, agriculture, industrial automation, environmental monitoring, and healthcare use WSN data. Many SNs monitor the network architecture's physical environment. Methods: This design lets SNs talk to neighbors and base stations. Due to power limits, WSNs must prioritise energy efficiency. ML enhances data processing, energy efficiency, and WSN performance. WSN sensors assist ML in predicting events. Machine learning improves data compression, anomaly detection, adaptive network management, WSN predictive modelling, industrial WSN performance, energy efficiency, data analysis, etc. In this work, the dataset, which has parameters such as SN’s positions, energy, distance from cluster head, and SN lifetime is provided as an input to the following ML models Linear Regression, Random Forest, SVM, Naive Bayes, PCA, K Nearest Neighbour, XG Boost, and NN. Results and Discussion: The result showed that the Linear Regression, Random Forest, SVM, Naive Bayes Classifier, PCA, K Nearest Neighbour, and XG Boost were all examined on the training and testing data. Conclusion: The training data accuracies are as follows: Linear Regression (46.64%), Random Forest (99.67%), XG Boost (99.99%), SVM (32.10%), K Nearest Neighbor (98.56%), Naïve Bayes Classifier (96.45%), Principle Component Analysis (97.88%) and NN (34.86%). The testing data accuracies are as follows: Linear Regression (22.00%), Random Forest (97.18%), XG Boost (96.94%), SVM (21.75%), K Nearest Neighbor (97.66%), Naïve Bayes Classifier(64.49%), PCA(99.38%) and NN(28.94%). Linear Regression, Random Forest, SVM, Naive Bayes Classifier, PCA, K Nearest Neighbour, and XG Boost were all examined. Results revealed that Random Forest and XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy, making them the most effective models for WSN prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sensors Wireless Communications and Control
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0122103279328716240819080916
Primary Topic
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing Wireless Sensor Network Through Machine Learning Techniques

Deepak Sethi, Shubhi Jain, Shrishti Kumari, TANUSHI TYAGI et al.
International Journal of Sensors Wireless Communications and Control
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
article

Implementing Wireless Sensor Network Through Machine Learning Techniques

Deepak Sethi, Shubhi Jain, Shrishti Kumari, TANUSHI TYAGI, Shraddha Gupta, MANAV GORA
article en

Abstract

Introduction: A regional WSN of independent SNs collects environmental and physical data. Sensors for specific applications measure light, pressure, temperature, humidity, etc. WSNs can transmit real-time data without infrastructure via radio frequencies. Smart cities, agriculture, industrial automation, environmental monitoring, and healthcare use WSN data. Many SNs monitor the network architecture's physical environment. Methods: This design lets SNs talk to neighbors and base stations. Due to power limits, WSNs must prioritise energy efficiency. ML enhances data processing, energy efficiency, and WSN performance. WSN sensors assist ML in predicting events. Machine learning improves data compression, anomaly detection, adaptive network management, WSN predictive modelling, industrial WSN performance, energy efficiency, data analysis, etc. In this work, the dataset, which has parameters such as SN’s positions, energy, distance from cluster head, and SN lifetime is provided as an input to the following ML models Linear Regression, Random Forest, SVM, Naive Bayes, PCA, K Nearest Neighbour, XG Boost, and NN. Results and Discussion: The result showed that the Linear Regression, Random Forest, SVM, Naive Bayes Classifier, PCA, K Nearest Neighbour, and XG Boost were all examined on the training and testing data. Conclusion: The training data accuracies are as follows: Linear Regression (46.64%), Random Forest (99.67%), XG Boost (99.99%), SVM (32.10%), K Nearest Neighbor (98.56%), Naïve Bayes Classifier (96.45%), Principle Component Analysis (97.88%) and NN (34.86%). The testing data accuracies are as follows: Linear Regression (22.00%), Random Forest (97.18%), XG Boost (96.94%), SVM (21.75%), K Nearest Neighbor (97.66%), Naïve Bayes Classifier(64.49%), PCA(99.38%) and NN(28.94%). Linear Regression, Random Forest, SVM, Naive Bayes Classifier, PCA, K Nearest Neighbour, and XG Boost were all examined. Results revealed that Random Forest and XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy, making them the most effective models for WSN prediction.

International Journal of Sensors Wireless Communications and ControlVol. 15(3)
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Institute of Management Technology (IN), Santosh University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.