Uropathogenic Candida: Microbial profile and antifungal sensitivity patterns in a tertiary care hospital in Vadodara, Gujarat

Fungal urinary tract infections (UTIs) are commonly caused by species, with albicans historically recognized as the most frequently isolated species. Differentiating between mere colonization and true infection—identifying whether the is a uropathogen or a commensal—is essential for appropriate clinical management. Antifungal sensitivity testing is critical in guiding effective treatment, particularly in the face of increasing resistance. The objective of this study was to analyze the microbial profile of candiduria, distinguish between uropathogenic and commensal isolates, and evaluate their Antifungal sensitivity patterns at a tertiary care hospital in Vadodara, Gujarat. This retrospective study was conducted over a one-year period, from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. A total of 9,227 urine samples from patients suspected of having UTIs were analyzed. Isolation and identification of species were performed using established microbiological methods, including culture on selective media and biochemical testing. Antifungal sensitivity testing was conducted following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines using the broth microdilution method. Patient clinical data were reviewed to differentiate uropathogenic isolates from commensals based on factors such as colony counts, presence of symptoms, and associated risk factors. Out of the 9,227 urine samples analyzed, 2,751 (29.82%) exhibited significant microbial growth, with species isolated in 67 (2.43%) of these cases. Of the 67 isolates, 45 (67.16%) were identified as uropathogens, while 22 (32.84%) were categorized as commensals. albicans was identified in 24 (35.82%) of the isolates, while non-albicans species accounted for 43 (64.18%), including (25.37%), (20.90%), (11.94%), and (5.97%). Antifungal sensitivity testing showed high sensitivity to echinocandins (caspofungin and micafungin), with varying resistance patterns observed for azoles and amphotericin B among different species. The study reveals a predominance of non-albicans species in cases of candiduria and emphasizes the importance of accurate species identification and Antifungal sensitivity testing. Differentiating between uropathogenic and commensal isolates is vital for guiding appropriate treatment. Continuous monitoring is necessary to detect emerging resistance trends and to inform treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IP International Journal of Medical Microbiology and Tropical Diseases
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmmtd.2024.044
Primary Topic
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uropathogenic Candida: Microbial profile and antifungal sensitivity patterns in a tertiary care hospital in Vadodara, Gujarat

Saurabh Chhotalal Norris, Binda Prakashbhai Pipaliya, Monika Lavjibhai Mavani, Tanuja Javadekar et al.
IP International Journal of Medical Microbiology and Tropical Diseases
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
article

Uropathogenic Candida: Microbial profile and antifungal sensitivity patterns in a tertiary care hospital in Vadodara, Gujarat

Saurabh Chhotalal Norris, Binda Prakashbhai Pipaliya, Monika Lavjibhai Mavani, Tanuja Javadekar, Dhwani Vasantkumar Patel
article en

Abstract

Fungal urinary tract infections (UTIs) are commonly caused by species, with albicans historically recognized as the most frequently isolated species. Differentiating between mere colonization and true infection—identifying whether the is a uropathogen or a commensal—is essential for appropriate clinical management. Antifungal sensitivity testing is critical in guiding effective treatment, particularly in the face of increasing resistance. The objective of this study was to analyze the microbial profile of candiduria, distinguish between uropathogenic and commensal isolates, and evaluate their Antifungal sensitivity patterns at a tertiary care hospital in Vadodara, Gujarat. This retrospective study was conducted over a one-year period, from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. A total of 9,227 urine samples from patients suspected of having UTIs were analyzed. Isolation and identification of species were performed using established microbiological methods, including culture on selective media and biochemical testing. Antifungal sensitivity testing was conducted following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines using the broth microdilution method. Patient clinical data were reviewed to differentiate uropathogenic isolates from commensals based on factors such as colony counts, presence of symptoms, and associated risk factors. Out of the 9,227 urine samples analyzed, 2,751 (29.82%) exhibited significant microbial growth, with species isolated in 67 (2.43%) of these cases. Of the 67 isolates, 45 (67.16%) were identified as uropathogens, while 22 (32.84%) were categorized as commensals. albicans was identified in 24 (35.82%) of the isolates, while non-albicans species accounted for 43 (64.18%), including (25.37%), (20.90%), (11.94%), and (5.97%). Antifungal sensitivity testing showed high sensitivity to echinocandins (caspofungin and micafungin), with varying resistance patterns observed for azoles and amphotericin B among different species. The study reveals a predominance of non-albicans species in cases of candiduria and emphasizes the importance of accurate species identification and Antifungal sensitivity testing. Differentiating between uropathogenic and commensal isolates is vital for guiding appropriate treatment. Continuous monitoring is necessary to detect emerging resistance trends and to inform treatment strategies.

IP International Journal of Medical Microbiology and Tropical DiseasesVol. 10(3)
M. P. Shah Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.