Routine ICU Surveillance after Brain Tumor Surgery: Patient Selection Using Machine Learning

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Routine postoperative ICU admission following brain tumor surgery may not benefit selected patients. The objective of this study was to develop a risk prediction instrument for early (within 24 h) postoperative adverse events using machine learning techniques. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort of 1000 consecutive adult patients undergoing elective brain tumor resection. Nine events/interventions (CPR, reintubation, return to OR, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, impaired consciousness, intracranial hypertension, swallowing disorders, and death) were chosen as target variables. Potential prognostic features (<i>n</i> = 27) from five categories were chosen and a gradient boosting algorithm (XGBoost) was trained and cross-validated in a 5 × 5 fashion. Prognostic performance, potential clinical impact, and relative feature importance were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Adverse events requiring ICU intervention occurred in 9.2% of cases. Other events not requiring ICU treatment were more frequent (35% of cases). The boosted decision trees yielded a cross-validated ROC-AUC of 0.81 ± 0.02 (mean ± CI95) when using pre- and post-op data. Using only pre-op data (scheduling decisions), ROC-AUC was 0.76 ± 0.02. PR-AUC was 0.38 ± 0.04 and 0.27 ± 0.03 for pre- and post-op data, respectively, compared to a baseline value (random classifier) of 0.092. Targeting a NPV of at least 95% would require ICU admission in just 15% (pre- and post-op data) or 30% (only pre-op data) of cases when using the prediction algorithm. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adoption of a risk prediction instrument based on boosted trees can support decision-makers to optimize ICU resource utilization while maintaining adequate patient safety. This may lead to a relevant reduction in ICU admissions for surveillance purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195747
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Routine ICU Surveillance after Brain Tumor Surgery: Patient Selection Using Machine Learning

Jan‐Oliver Neumann, Andreas Unterberg, Amin Nohman, Stephanie Schmidt et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
0.74
article

Routine ICU Surveillance after Brain Tumor Surgery: Patient Selection Using Machine Learning

Jan‐Oliver Neumann, Andreas Unterberg, Amin Nohman, Stephanie Schmidt, Paul Naser, Martin Jakobs
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Routine postoperative ICU admission following brain tumor surgery may not benefit selected patients. The objective of this study was to develop a risk prediction instrument for early (within 24 h) postoperative adverse events using machine learning techniques. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort of 1000 consecutive adult patients undergoing elective brain tumor resection. Nine events/interventions (CPR, reintubation, return to OR, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, impaired consciousness, intracranial hypertension, swallowing disorders, and death) were chosen as target variables. Potential prognostic features (<i>n</i> = 27) from five categories were chosen and a gradient boosting algorithm (XGBoost) was trained and cross-validated in a 5 × 5 fashion. Prognostic performance, potential clinical impact, and relative feature importance were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Adverse events requiring ICU intervention occurred in 9.2% of cases. Other events not requiring ICU treatment were more frequent (35% of cases). The boosted decision trees yielded a cross-validated ROC-AUC of 0.81 ± 0.02 (mean ± CI95) when using pre- and post-op data. Using only pre-op data (scheduling decisions), ROC-AUC was 0.76 ± 0.02. PR-AUC was 0.38 ± 0.04 and 0.27 ± 0.03 for pre- and post-op data, respectively, compared to a baseline value (random classifier) of 0.092. Targeting a NPV of at least 95% would require ICU admission in just 15% (pre- and post-op data) or 30% (only pre-op data) of cases when using the prediction algorithm. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adoption of a risk prediction instrument based on boosted trees can support decision-makers to optimize ICU resource utilization while maintaining adequate patient safety. This may lead to a relevant reduction in ICU admissions for surveillance purposes.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(19)
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
0.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.