The diffusion of American fair housing law and policy

Abstract Objective We investigate the contributions of state and local governments to the diffusion of American fair housing law and policy, focusing on the period from 1919 to 1968, prior to similar legal requirements and policies being approved at the federal level. Methods Relying on archival data obtained at two presidential libraries, our findings provide insights into diffusion's political effects. Results Myriad state and local laws, constituting breakthroughs that spread horizontally and/or bottom‐up, preceded similar requirements in the national Fair Housing Act of 1968 and implementation policies subsequently adopted by the federal bureaucracy. Conclusions Progressive subnational governments can promote the rights of politically marginalized individuals and groups when the national government and other subnational jurisdictions do not. States and localities can use desegregation approaches not available at the federal level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Quarterly
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13450
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The diffusion of American fair housing law and policy

Charles S. Bullock, Charles M. Lamb
3 citations
Social Science Quarterly
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
1.62
article

The diffusion of American fair housing law and policy

Charles S. Bullock, Charles M. Lamb
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective We investigate the contributions of state and local governments to the diffusion of American fair housing law and policy, focusing on the period from 1919 to 1968, prior to similar legal requirements and policies being approved at the federal level. Methods Relying on archival data obtained at two presidential libraries, our findings provide insights into diffusion's political effects. Results Myriad state and local laws, constituting breakthroughs that spread horizontally and/or bottom‐up, preceded similar requirements in the national Fair Housing Act of 1968 and implementation policies subsequently adopted by the federal bureaucracy. Conclusions Progressive subnational governments can promote the rights of politically marginalized individuals and groups when the national government and other subnational jurisdictions do not. States and localities can use desegregation approaches not available at the federal level.

Social Science QuarterlyVol. 105(7)
University of Georgia (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.