The lensing effect of quantum-corrected black hole and parameter constraints from EHT observations

Abstract The quantum-corrected black hole model demonstrates significant potential in the study of gravitational lensing effects. By incorporating quantum effects, this model addresses the singularity problem in classical black holes. In this paper, we investigate the impact of the quantum correction parameter on the lensing effect based on the quantum-corrected black hole model. Using the black holes $$M87^*$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mn>87</mml:mn><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> and $$Sgr A^*$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> as our subjects, we explore the influence of the quantum correction parameter on angular position, Einstein ring, and time delay. Additionally, we use data from the Event Horizon Telescope observations of black hole shadows to constrain the quantum correction parameter. Our results indicate that the quantum correction parameter significantly affects the lensing coefficients $$\bar{a}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:math> and $$\bar{b}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:math> , as well as the Einstein ring. The position $$\theta _{\infty }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>∞</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math> and brightness ratio S of the relativistic image exhibit significant changes,with deviations on the order of magnitude of $$\sim 1\,\upmu \! \textrm{as}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mspace/><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mspace/><mml:mtext>as</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> and $$\sim 0.01\,\upmu \! \textrm{as}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn><mml:mspace/><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mspace/><mml:mtext>as</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> , respectively. The impact of the quantum correction parameter on the time delay $$\Delta T_{21}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> is particularly significant in the $$M87^*$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mn>87</mml:mn><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> black hole, with deviations reaching up to several tens of hours. Using observational data from the Event Horizon Telescope(EHT) of black hole shadows to constrain the quantum correction parameter, the constraint range under the $$M87^*$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mn>87</mml:mn><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> black hole is $$0\le \frac{\alpha }{M^2}\le 1.4087$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.4087</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> and the constraint range under the $$Sgr A^*$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> black hole is $$0.9713\le \frac{\alpha }{M^2}\le 1.6715$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.9713</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.6715</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> . Although the current resolution of the EHT limits the observation of subtle differences, future high-resolution telescopes are expected to further distinguish between the quantum-corrected black hole and the Schwarzschild black hole, providing new avenues for exploring quantum gravitational effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13342-z
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The lensing effect of quantum-corrected black hole and parameter constraints from EHT observations

Zhaoyi Xu, Lai Zhao, Meirong Tang
19 citations
The European Physical Journal C
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
12.53
article

The lensing effect of quantum-corrected black hole and parameter constraints from EHT observations

Zhaoyi Xu, Lai Zhao, Meirong Tang
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Abstract The quantum-corrected black hole model demonstrates significant potential in the study of gravitational lensing effects. By incorporating quantum effects, this model addresses the singularity problem in classical black holes. In this paper, we investigate the impact of the quantum correction parameter on the lensing effect based on the quantum-corrected black hole model. Using the black holes $$M87^*$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mn>87</mml:mn><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> and $$Sgr A^*$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> as our subjects, we explore the influence of the quantum correction parameter on angular position, Einstein ring, and time delay. Additionally, we use data from the Event Horizon Telescope observations of black hole shadows to constrain the quantum correction parameter. Our results indicate that the quantum correction parameter significantly affects the lensing coefficients $$\bar{a}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:math> and $$\bar{b}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:math> , as well as the Einstein ring. The position $$\theta _{\infty }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>∞</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math> and brightness ratio S of the relativistic image exhibit significant changes,with deviations on the order of magnitude of $$\sim 1\,\upmu \! \textrm{as}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mspace/><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mspace/><mml:mtext>as</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> and $$\sim 0.01\,\upmu \! \textrm{as}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn><mml:mspace/><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mspace/><mml:mtext>as</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> , respectively. The impact of the quantum correction parameter on the time delay $$\Delta T_{21}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> is particularly significant in the $$M87^*$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mn>87</mml:mn><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> black hole, with deviations reaching up to several tens of hours. Using observational data from the Event Horizon Telescope(EHT) of black hole shadows to constrain the quantum correction parameter, the constraint range under the $$M87^*$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mn>87</mml:mn><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> black hole is $$0\le \frac{\alpha }{M^2}\le 1.4087$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.4087</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> and the constraint range under the $$Sgr A^*$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> black hole is $$0.9713\le \frac{\alpha }{M^2}\le 1.6715$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.9713</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.6715</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> . Although the current resolution of the EHT limits the observation of subtle differences, future high-resolution telescopes are expected to further distinguish between the quantum-corrected black hole and the Schwarzschild black hole, providing new avenues for exploring quantum gravitational effects.

The European Physical Journal CVol. 84(9)
Guizhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guizhou University
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
12.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.