Losing on the home front? Battlefield casualties, media, and public support for foreign interventions

Abstract How domestic constituents respond to signals of weakness in foreign wars remains an important question in international relations. This paper studies the impact of battlefield casualties and media coverage on public demand for war termination. To identify the effect of troop fatalities, we leverage the timing of survey collection across respondents from nine members of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. Quasi‐experimental evidence demonstrates that battlefield casualties increase the news coverage of Afghanistan and the public demand for withdrawal. Evidence from a survey experiment replicates the main results. To shed light on the media mechanism, we leverage a news pressure design and find that major sporting matches occurring around the time of battlefield casualties drive down subsequent coverage, and significantly weaken the effect of casualties on support for war termination. These results highlight the role that media play in shaping public support for foreign military interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Political Science
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12907
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Losing on the home front? Battlefield casualties, media, and public support for foreign interventions

Pedro Souza, Thiemo Fetzer, Oliver Vanden Eynde, Austin L. Wright
3 citations
American Journal of Political Science
Media Influence and Politics
2.26
article

Losing on the home front? Battlefield casualties, media, and public support for foreign interventions

Pedro Souza, Thiemo Fetzer, Oliver Vanden Eynde, Austin L. Wright
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract How domestic constituents respond to signals of weakness in foreign wars remains an important question in international relations. This paper studies the impact of battlefield casualties and media coverage on public demand for war termination. To identify the effect of troop fatalities, we leverage the timing of survey collection across respondents from nine members of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. Quasi‐experimental evidence demonstrates that battlefield casualties increase the news coverage of Afghanistan and the public demand for withdrawal. Evidence from a survey experiment replicates the main results. To shed light on the media mechanism, we leverage a news pressure design and find that major sporting matches occurring around the time of battlefield casualties drive down subsequent coverage, and significantly weaken the effect of casualties on support for war termination. These results highlight the role that media play in shaping public support for foreign military interventions.

American Journal of Political ScienceVol. 69(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Bonn (DE), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Warwick (GB), University of Chicago (US), Paris School of Economics (FR)
University of Cambridge
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Media Influence and Politics
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Losing on the home front? Battlefield casualties, media, and public support for foreign interventions — Pedro Souza, Thiemo Fetzer, et al. · American Journal of Political Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS