Cost–effectiveness of lung cancer screening with volume computed tomography in Portugal

<b>Aim:</b> Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in Portugal. The Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening (LCS) study (NELSON), the biggest European LCS study, showed a lung cancer mortality reduction in a high-risk population when being screened. In this study, the cost-effectiveness of LCS, based on the NELSON study protocol and outcomes, was evaluated compared with no screening in Portugal. <b>Methods:</b> The present study modified an established decision tree by incorporating a state-transition Markov model to evaluate the health-related advantages and economic implications of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) LCS from the healthcare standpoint in Portugal. The analysis compared screening versus no screening for a high-risk population aged 50-75 with a smoking history. Various metrics, including clinical outcomes, costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life-years (LYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), were calculated to measure the impact of LDCT LCS. Furthermore, scenario and sensitivity analyses were executed to assess the robustness of the obtained results. <b>Results:</b> Annual LCS with volume-based LDCT resulted in €558 million additional costs and 86,678 additional QALYs resulting in an ICER of €6440 per QALY for one screening group and a lifetime horizon. In total, 13,217 premature lung cancer deaths could be averted, leading to 1.41 additional QALYs gained per individual diagnosed with lung cancer. Results are robust based on the sensitivity analyses. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study showed that annual LDCT LCS for a high-risk population could be cost-effective in Portugal based on a willingness to pay a threshold of one-time the GDP (€19,290 per QALY gained).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0102
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost–effectiveness of lung cancer screening with volume computed tomography in Portugal

Rui Medeiros, Gabriela Fernandes, Fernando Guedes, Venceslau Hespanhol et al.
5 citations
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
2.09
article

Cost–effectiveness of lung cancer screening with volume computed tomography in Portugal

Rui Medeiros, Gabriela Fernandes, Fernando Guedes, Venceslau Hespanhol, Lurdes Ferreira, F. Estevinho, Marina Borges, Hilde ten Berge, Fernando Martelo, António Araújo, Xuanqi Pan, Lourdes Barradas, K. Togka, Rita Martins de Sousa, Sara Figueiredo, Encarnação Teixeira, Daniel Cabral
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Aim:</b> Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in Portugal. The Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening (LCS) study (NELSON), the biggest European LCS study, showed a lung cancer mortality reduction in a high-risk population when being screened. In this study, the cost-effectiveness of LCS, based on the NELSON study protocol and outcomes, was evaluated compared with no screening in Portugal. <b>Methods:</b> The present study modified an established decision tree by incorporating a state-transition Markov model to evaluate the health-related advantages and economic implications of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) LCS from the healthcare standpoint in Portugal. The analysis compared screening versus no screening for a high-risk population aged 50-75 with a smoking history. Various metrics, including clinical outcomes, costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life-years (LYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), were calculated to measure the impact of LDCT LCS. Furthermore, scenario and sensitivity analyses were executed to assess the robustness of the obtained results. <b>Results:</b> Annual LCS with volume-based LDCT resulted in €558 million additional costs and 86,678 additional QALYs resulting in an ICER of €6440 per QALY for one screening group and a lifetime horizon. In total, 13,217 premature lung cancer deaths could be averted, leading to 1.41 additional QALYs gained per individual diagnosed with lung cancer. Results are robust based on the sensitivity analyses. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study showed that annual LDCT LCS for a high-risk population could be cost-effective in Portugal based on a willingness to pay a threshold of one-time the GDP (€19,290 per QALY gained).

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness ResearchVol. 13(11)
Fernando Pessoa University (PT), Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg (LU), University of Groningen (NL), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT), Hospital Pulido Valente (PT), Hospital de São João (PT), Portuguese League Against Epilepsy (PT), Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil (PT), Hospital Pedro Hispano (PT), IPO Porto (PT), Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte (PT), Hospital de Santo António (PT), Hospital da Luz (PT), Hospital Braga (PT), AstraZeneca (Portugal) (PT)
Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre, Servier, Liga Portuguesa Contra o Cancro, Ipsen, Daiichi Sankyo Europe, Cilag
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.