Biobanking, digital health and privacy: the choices of 1410 volunteers and neurological patients regarding limitations on use of data and biological samples, return of results and sharing

Consent for the donation of material for research purposes is crucial for biobanking and biomedical research studies that use biological material of human origin. Here, we have shown that choices regarding participation in a neurological biobank can be different between HVs and NPs, even if the benefit for research and scientific progress is recognized. NP have a strong interest in being informed of possible results but limit sharing of samples, highlighting a perception of greater individual or relative benefit, while HV prefer a wide dissemination and sharing of data but not to have the return of the results, favoring a possible benefit for society and knowledge. The results underline the need to carefully manage biological material and data collected in biobanks, in compliance with the GDPR and the specific requests of donors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01102-3
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biobanking, digital health and privacy: the choices of 1410 volunteers and neurological patients regarding limitations on use of data and biological samples, return of results and sharing

Giorgia Presicce, Giorgio Scivoletto, Stefano Paolucci, Domenico De Angelis et al.
6 citations
BMC Medical Ethics
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.26
article

Biobanking, digital health and privacy: the choices of 1410 volunteers and neurological patients regarding limitations on use of data and biological samples, return of results and sharing

Giorgia Presicce, Giorgio Scivoletto, Stefano Paolucci, Domenico De Angelis, F. Spanedda, Francesca R. Fusco, Emilia Giannella, Simona Gabriella Di Santo, Stefano Brunelli, Rita Formisano, Giulia Maria Sancesario, Elisabetta Costa, Maria Grazia Grasso, Josep Miquel Bauça, Sergio Di Fonzo, Antonio Perre, Valerio Pisani
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Consent for the donation of material for research purposes is crucial for biobanking and biomedical research studies that use biological material of human origin. Here, we have shown that choices regarding participation in a neurological biobank can be different between HVs and NPs, even if the benefit for research and scientific progress is recognized. NP have a strong interest in being informed of possible results but limit sharing of samples, highlighting a perception of greater individual or relative benefit, while HV prefer a wide dissemination and sharing of data but not to have the return of the results, favoring a possible benefit for society and knowledge. The results underline the need to carefully manage biological material and data collected in biobanks, in compliance with the GDPR and the specific requests of donors.

BMC Medical EthicsVol. 25(1)
European Brain Research Institute (IT), Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT), Hospital Universitario Son Espases (ES), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Institute of Biomedical Technologies (IT), National Research Council (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics in Clinical Research
3.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.