Comparing MLR and ANN models for school building electrical energy prediction in Osijek-Baranja County in Croatia

This paper presents a study conducted in Osijek-Baranja County, Croatia, to predict electrical energy consumption in school buildings. Data from the Energy Management Information System (EMIS) database for primary and secondary schools were analyzed using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). The ANN model achieved a high R² of 0957 in the training set, with lower Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) than the MLR model, which had an R² of 0950. On the validation set, the ANN model maintained an R² of 0954 and showed slightly better performance with a lower Coefficient of Variation of RMSE (CVRMSE) of 19,79 %, compared to the MLR model’s CVRMSE of 20,50 %. These results indicate that the ANN model generally provides more accurate and reliable predictions for energy consumption in school buildings. However, both models provided a robust positive correlation between the predicted and actual values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.039
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing MLR and ANN models for school building electrical energy prediction in Osijek-Baranja County in Croatia

Hrvoje Krstić, Hana Begić
5 citations
Energy Reports
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.33
article

Comparing MLR and ANN models for school building electrical energy prediction in Osijek-Baranja County in Croatia

Hrvoje Krstić, Hana Begić
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a study conducted in Osijek-Baranja County, Croatia, to predict electrical energy consumption in school buildings. Data from the Energy Management Information System (EMIS) database for primary and secondary schools were analyzed using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). The ANN model achieved a high R² of 0957 in the training set, with lower Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) than the MLR model, which had an R² of 0950. On the validation set, the ANN model maintained an R² of 0954 and showed slightly better performance with a lower Coefficient of Variation of RMSE (CVRMSE) of 19,79 %, compared to the MLR model’s CVRMSE of 20,50 %. These results indicate that the ANN model generally provides more accurate and reliable predictions for energy consumption in school buildings. However, both models provided a robust positive correlation between the predicted and actual values.

Energy ReportsVol. 12
University of Osijek (HR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.