Student approaches to generating mathematical examples: comparing e-assessment and paper-based tasks

Abstract Example-generation tasks have been suggested as an effective way to both promote students’ learning of mathematics and assess students’ understanding of concepts. E-assessment offers the potential to use example-generation tasks with large groups of students, but there has been little research on this approach so far. Across two studies, we investigate students’ responses to a particular sequence of example-generation tasks, posed either on paper or through e-assessment. We identify a striking difference in students’ example-generation strategies and success, for e-assessment and paper-based versions of the same tasks. This suggests the use of example-generation tasks in e-assessment may not be straightforward, and we conclude by discussing the implications for teaching and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10361-1
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student approaches to generating mathematical examples: comparing e-assessment and paper-based tasks

George Kinnear, Paola Iannone, Ben Davies
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Student approaches to generating mathematical examples: comparing e-assessment and paper-based tasks

George Kinnear, Paola Iannone, Ben Davies
article en

Abstract

Abstract Example-generation tasks have been suggested as an effective way to both promote students’ learning of mathematics and assess students’ understanding of concepts. E-assessment offers the potential to use example-generation tasks with large groups of students, but there has been little research on this approach so far. Across two studies, we investigate students’ responses to a particular sequence of example-generation tasks, posed either on paper or through e-assessment. We identify a striking difference in students’ example-generation strategies and success, for e-assessment and paper-based versions of the same tasks. This suggests the use of example-generation tasks in e-assessment may not be straightforward, and we conclude by discussing the implications for teaching and research.

Educational Studies in MathematicsVol. 119(2)
Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences (GB), University of Southampton (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.