Enhancing coherence and student engagement through portfolio assignments and peer-feedback
Portfolio assignments and peer-feedback can enhance coherence and student engagement in a course programme, thereby improving learning outcomes. In a course, students obtain permission to take the examination for their semester course upon approval of at least three out of five portfolio assignments. The portfolio comprises three individual assignments with peer-feedback and two group assignments, one of which includes peer-feedback. In the evaluation of the developmental process, electronic course evaluations were conducted by all students, and semi-structured interviews were held with five students. We found that the use of portfolio assignments and peer-feedback has increased the coherence of the course and ensured that students engage with the academic content between course sessions. Furthermore, portfolio assignments and peer-feedback have promoted the use of in-depth learning strategies and enhanced student reflection. We estimate that criterion-based feedback guides and rubrics have boosted student confidence and improved the quality of their assignments. To implement peer-feedback effectively, we consider it necessary to support the complex processes involved with a stable and well-functioning digital peer-feedback tool.
Authors
- Janne Saltoft Hansen
- Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2255-1391)
- Thomas Maribo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0856-6837)
- Maiken Bay Ravn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-6070)
Institutions
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Central Denmark Region (DK)
- Department of Health Services (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Discover Education
- Published
- 2024-09-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00260-1
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Reflective Practices in Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.29