Efficiency and Equity Impacts of Urban Transportation Policies with Equilibrium Sorting

We estimate an equilibrium sorting model of housing location and commuting mode choice with endogenous traffic congestion to evaluate urban transportation policies. Leveraging fine-scale data from travel diaries and housing transactions identifying residents' home and work locations, we recover rich preference heterogeneity over both travel mode and residential location decisions. While different policies produce the same congestion reduction, their impacts on social welfare differ drastically. In addition, sorting undermines the congestion reduction under driving restrictions and subway expansion but strengthens it under congestion pricing. The combination of congestion pricing and subway expansion delivers the greatest congestion relief and efficiency gains. (JEL H76, O18, P25, R23, R31, R41, R48)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20220212
Citations
23
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficiency and Equity Impacts of Urban Transportation Policies with Equilibrium Sorting

Tianli Xia, Shanjun Li, Panle Jia Barwick, Andrew Waxman et al.
23 citations
American Economic Review
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
9.65
article

Efficiency and Equity Impacts of Urban Transportation Policies with Equilibrium Sorting

Tianli Xia, Shanjun Li, Panle Jia Barwick, Andrew Waxman, Jing Wu
article en
23 citations

Abstract

We estimate an equilibrium sorting model of housing location and commuting mode choice with endogenous traffic congestion to evaluate urban transportation policies. Leveraging fine-scale data from travel diaries and housing transactions identifying residents' home and work locations, we recover rich preference heterogeneity over both travel mode and residential location decisions. While different policies produce the same congestion reduction, their impacts on social welfare differ drastically. In addition, sorting undermines the congestion reduction under driving restrictions and subway expansion but strengthens it under congestion pricing. The combination of congestion pricing and subway expansion delivers the greatest congestion relief and efficiency gains. (JEL H76, O18, P25, R23, R31, R41, R48)

American Economic ReviewVol. 114(10)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Cornell University (US), Dyson (United Kingdom) (GB), Madison Group (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
9.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.