Public Discourse and Socially Responsible Market Behavior

We investigate the causal impact of public discourse on socially responsible market behavior. Across three laboratory experiments, having market participants engage in public discourse generally increases market social responsibility. These positive impacts are robust to variation in several characteristics of the discourse. We provide evidence that discourse strengthens beliefs that others support socially responsible exchange. However, relaxing requirements to engage in discourse sharply reduces its effectiveness. Our findings suggest that campaigns encouraging discussion of appropriate market behavior can have sizable impacts on addressing inefficiencies due to market failures but that policies encouraging broad public engagement may be important. (JEL C92, D62, D83, D91, P36, M14, Z13)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201361
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Discourse and Socially Responsible Market Behavior

Roberto A. Weber, Vanessa Valero, Björn Bartling, Yao Lan
11 citations
American Economic Review
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
3.68
article

Public Discourse and Socially Responsible Market Behavior

Roberto A. Weber, Vanessa Valero, Björn Bartling, Yao Lan
article en
11 citations

Abstract

We investigate the causal impact of public discourse on socially responsible market behavior. Across three laboratory experiments, having market participants engage in public discourse generally increases market social responsibility. These positive impacts are robust to variation in several characteristics of the discourse. We provide evidence that discourse strengthens beliefs that others support socially responsible exchange. However, relaxing requirements to engage in discourse sharply reduces its effectiveness. Our findings suggest that campaigns encouraging discussion of appropriate market behavior can have sizable impacts on addressing inefficiencies due to market failures but that policies encouraging broad public engagement may be important. (JEL C92, D62, D83, D91, P36, M14, Z13)

American Economic ReviewVol. 114(10)
University of Leicester (GB), Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), University of Zurich (CH), Institut Mines-Télécom Business School (FR)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
3.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.