Psychometric properties of the German version of the brief resilience scale in persons with mental disorders

The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) was developed to assess individual differences in the ability to recover from stress despite adversity and has been translated into several languages. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties (i.e., item characteristics, reliability, factor structure, measurement invariance, and validity) of the German version of the BRS in persons with mental disorders. A total of N = 5,986 persons admitted to inpatient treatment completed the German version of the BRS and other questionnaires. The discriminating power of the items, the difficulty of the items, and the internal consistency were all sufficient. Moreover, confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure of the BRS, consistent with the findings of the German validation study in a non-clinical sample. The BRS also had strict measurement invariance across diagnostic groups for mental disorders according to ICD-10. Validity was examined using a network analysis, in which the BRS demonstrated positive correlations with life satisfaction, self-efficacy and optimism and negative correlations with somatic symptoms, anxiety, insomnia, and depression. The BRS can serve as a reliable and valid tool for assessing resilience in clinical settings, facilitating the identification of persons with potentially lower psychosocial resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06062-x
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric properties of the German version of the brief resilience scale in persons with mental disorders

Isabella Helmreich, Adrian Meule, Andrea Chmitorz, Jan Broll et al.
3 citations
BMC Psychiatry
Resilience and Mental Health
1.92
article

Psychometric properties of the German version of the brief resilience scale in persons with mental disorders

Isabella Helmreich, Adrian Meule, Andrea Chmitorz, Jan Broll, Sarah Katharina Schäfer, Ulrich Voderholzer, Klaus Lieb
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) was developed to assess individual differences in the ability to recover from stress despite adversity and has been translated into several languages. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties (i.e., item characteristics, reliability, factor structure, measurement invariance, and validity) of the German version of the BRS in persons with mental disorders. A total of N = 5,986 persons admitted to inpatient treatment completed the German version of the BRS and other questionnaires. The discriminating power of the items, the difficulty of the items, and the internal consistency were all sufficient. Moreover, confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure of the BRS, consistent with the findings of the German validation study in a non-clinical sample. The BRS also had strict measurement invariance across diagnostic groups for mental disorders according to ICD-10. Validity was examined using a network analysis, in which the BRS demonstrated positive correlations with life satisfaction, self-efficacy and optimism and negative correlations with somatic symptoms, anxiety, insomnia, and depression. The BRS can serve as a reliable and valid tool for assessing resilience in clinical settings, facilitating the identification of persons with potentially lower psychosocial resources.

BMC PsychiatryVol. 24(1)
Esslingen University of Applied Sciences (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Schön Klinik Roseneck (DE), Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University of Regensburg (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Resilience and Mental Health
1.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.