Investigating the role of mental imagery use in the assessment of anhedonia

Anhedonia, or a deficit in the liking, wanting, and seeking of rewards, is typically assessed via self-reported "in-the-moment" emotional and motivational responses to reward stimuli and activities. Given that mental imagery is known to evoke emotion and motivational responses, we conducted two studies to investigate the relationship between mental imagery use and self-reported anhedonia. Using a novel Reward Response Scale (adapted from the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale, DARS; Rizvi et al., 2015) modified to assess deliberate and spontaneous mental imagery use, Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 394) compared uninstructed and instructed mental imagery use, and Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 586) conducted a test of replication of uninstructed mental imagery use. Results showed that greater mental imagery use was associated with higher reward response scores (Study 1 & 2), and this relationship was not moderated by whether imagery use was uninstructed or instructed (Study 1). Importantly, mental imagery use moderated the convergence between reward response and depression scale measures of anhedonia, with lower convergence for those reporting higher mental imagery use (Study 1 & 2). Results suggest that higher spontaneous mental imagery use may increase self-reported reward response and reduce the convergence between reward response scale and depression questionnaire measures of anhedonia. [199 / 200 words].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2405008
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the role of mental imagery use in the assessment of anhedonia

Patrick Clarke, Julie L. Ji, Lies Notebaert, Jürgen Margraf et al.
3 citations
Cognition & Emotion
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.03
article

Investigating the role of mental imagery use in the assessment of anhedonia

Patrick Clarke, Julie L. Ji, Lies Notebaert, Jürgen Margraf, Jemma Todd, Simon E. Blackwell, Marcella L. Woud, Frances Meeten, Angela Rölver
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Anhedonia, or a deficit in the liking, wanting, and seeking of rewards, is typically assessed via self-reported "in-the-moment" emotional and motivational responses to reward stimuli and activities. Given that mental imagery is known to evoke emotion and motivational responses, we conducted two studies to investigate the relationship between mental imagery use and self-reported anhedonia. Using a novel Reward Response Scale (adapted from the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale, DARS; Rizvi et al., 2015) modified to assess deliberate and spontaneous mental imagery use, Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 394) compared uninstructed and instructed mental imagery use, and Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 586) conducted a test of replication of uninstructed mental imagery use. Results showed that greater mental imagery use was associated with higher reward response scores (Study 1 & 2), and this relationship was not moderated by whether imagery use was uninstructed or instructed (Study 1). Importantly, mental imagery use moderated the convergence between reward response and depression scale measures of anhedonia, with lower convergence for those reporting higher mental imagery use (Study 1 & 2). Results suggest that higher spontaneous mental imagery use may increase self-reported reward response and reduce the convergence between reward response scale and depression questionnaire measures of anhedonia. [199 / 200 words].

Cognition & EmotionVol. 39(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Sussex (GB), The University of Western Australia (AU), King's College London (GB), Curtin University (AU), Enable Ireland (IE), University Hospital Münster (DE), Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Göttingen (DE), University of Plymouth (GB), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.