Spring precipitation amount and timing predict restoration success in a semi‐arid ecosystem

Abstract Successful restoration of semi‐arid ecosystems remains a challenging problem. Many studies have tried to elucidate the factors that limit seedling establishment so that mitigating actions can be taken during restoration. However, most studies have been plot‐based trials on individual sites that encompass only 1 or 2 years of meteorological variation. This limits the inferences that can be drawn. To move beyond short‐term research, we examined seedling establishment after the first growing season on 48 public lands sites undergoing restoration in the sagebrush steppe of the northern Great Basin over the course of 5 years (2016–2020), while simultaneously accounting for a broad suite of biotic (five), abiotic site (six), management (five) and weather variables (29). All these variables have been previously identified as influencing successful restoration. Using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and a random forest algorithm, we identified nine variables associated with surviving seedlings at the end of the first growing season. Seedling establishment averaged 9.6 (±10.2 SD) individuals m −2 . Precipitation variables accounted for 75% of the explained variation in seedling survival. April precipitation was the largest contributor and accounted for 27% of explained variation. Average length of dry period in February and number of rainfall events >5 mm March–May were also important predictors of survival, accounting for 13% and 10% of the explained variation, respectively. Only one biotic variable (annual grass density) and one management variable (drill seeding) accounted for more than 5% of the explained variance by the model. While temperature may be important in many models of seedling establishment, water availability during the emergence period (February–April) appeared to play the most important role determining the number of seedlings surviving at the end of the first growing season in this study. Synthesis and applications . The importance of April precipitation in predicting seedling establishment densities makes it a variable that should be included in restoration success forecasting models. Similarly, since dry periods and precipitation frequency combined explain nearly as much variation in establishment, efforts should be made to improve seasonal forecasting to include predictions of frequency and event size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14779
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spring precipitation amount and timing predict restoration success in a semi‐arid ecosystem

Elsie M. Denton, Roger L. Sheley, Stuart P. Hardegree
5 citations
Journal of Applied Ecology
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
5.15
article

Spring precipitation amount and timing predict restoration success in a semi‐arid ecosystem

Elsie M. Denton, Roger L. Sheley, Stuart P. Hardegree
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Successful restoration of semi‐arid ecosystems remains a challenging problem. Many studies have tried to elucidate the factors that limit seedling establishment so that mitigating actions can be taken during restoration. However, most studies have been plot‐based trials on individual sites that encompass only 1 or 2 years of meteorological variation. This limits the inferences that can be drawn. To move beyond short‐term research, we examined seedling establishment after the first growing season on 48 public lands sites undergoing restoration in the sagebrush steppe of the northern Great Basin over the course of 5 years (2016–2020), while simultaneously accounting for a broad suite of biotic (five), abiotic site (six), management (five) and weather variables (29). All these variables have been previously identified as influencing successful restoration. Using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and a random forest algorithm, we identified nine variables associated with surviving seedlings at the end of the first growing season. Seedling establishment averaged 9.6 (±10.2 SD) individuals m −2 . Precipitation variables accounted for 75% of the explained variation in seedling survival. April precipitation was the largest contributor and accounted for 27% of explained variation. Average length of dry period in February and number of rainfall events >5 mm March–May were also important predictors of survival, accounting for 13% and 10% of the explained variation, respectively. Only one biotic variable (annual grass density) and one management variable (drill seeding) accounted for more than 5% of the explained variance by the model. While temperature may be important in many models of seedling establishment, water availability during the emergence period (February–April) appeared to play the most important role determining the number of seedlings surviving at the end of the first growing season in this study. Synthesis and applications . The importance of April precipitation in predicting seedling establishment densities makes it a variable that should be included in restoration success forecasting models. Similarly, since dry periods and precipitation frequency combined explain nearly as much variation in establishment, efforts should be made to improve seasonal forecasting to include predictions of frequency and event size.

Journal of Applied EcologyVol. 61(12)
Agricultural Research Service (US), Northwest Watershed Research Center (US)
Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.