Variable and dynamic associations between hot weather, thermal comfort, and individuals’ emotional states during summertime

The effects of heat exposure on negative affect are thought to be central to the observed relationships between hot summer days and deleterious outcomes, such as violent crime or mental health crises. As these relationships are likely to be magnified by the effects of climate change, a better understanding of how consistent or variable the effects of hot weather on affective states is required. The current work combines data gathered from an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study on individuals' thermal perceptions, comfort, and affective states in outdoor environments during their daily lives with high spatiotemporal resolution climate-modeled weather variables. Using these data, associations between objective weather variables (temperature, humidity, etc.), perceived heat (thermal perception and comfort), and affective states are examined. Overall, objective weather data reasonably predicted perception and comfort, but only comfort predicted negative affective states. The variance explained across individuals was generally very low in predicting negative affect or comfort, but within-person variance explained was high. In other words, while there may be a relatively consistent relationship between temperature and psychological experience for any given person, there are significant individual differences across people. Age and gender were examined as moderators of these relationships, and while gender had no impact, participant age showed several significant interactions. Specifically, while older adults tended to experience more thermal discomfort and perceived higher temperatures as hotter, the relationship between discomfort and negative affect was lower in older adults. Taken together, these results emphasize the importance of thermal discomfort specifically in predicting negative affect, as well as the high inter-individual variability in thermal perceptions and comfort for the same ambient temperatures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02005-z
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variable and dynamic associations between hot weather, thermal comfort, and individuals’ emotional states during summertime

Marc G. Berman, Kimberly Lewis Meidenbauer, Andrew J. Stier, Kathryn E. Schertz et al.
9 citations
BMC Psychology
Climate Change and Health Impacts
2.83
article

Variable and dynamic associations between hot weather, thermal comfort, and individuals’ emotional states during summertime

Marc G. Berman, Kimberly Lewis Meidenbauer, Andrew J. Stier, Kathryn E. Schertz, Tiara Rose Freeman, Ashish Sharma, Elizabeth Janey, Anya Leslie Samtani, Kathryn Gehrke, Peiyuan Li
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The effects of heat exposure on negative affect are thought to be central to the observed relationships between hot summer days and deleterious outcomes, such as violent crime or mental health crises. As these relationships are likely to be magnified by the effects of climate change, a better understanding of how consistent or variable the effects of hot weather on affective states is required. The current work combines data gathered from an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study on individuals' thermal perceptions, comfort, and affective states in outdoor environments during their daily lives with high spatiotemporal resolution climate-modeled weather variables. Using these data, associations between objective weather variables (temperature, humidity, etc.), perceived heat (thermal perception and comfort), and affective states are examined. Overall, objective weather data reasonably predicted perception and comfort, but only comfort predicted negative affective states. The variance explained across individuals was generally very low in predicting negative affect or comfort, but within-person variance explained was high. In other words, while there may be a relatively consistent relationship between temperature and psychological experience for any given person, there are significant individual differences across people. Age and gender were examined as moderators of these relationships, and while gender had no impact, participant age showed several significant interactions. Specifically, while older adults tended to experience more thermal discomfort and perceived higher temperatures as hotter, the relationship between discomfort and negative affect was lower in older adults. Taken together, these results emphasize the importance of thermal discomfort specifically in predicting negative affect, as well as the high inter-individual variability in thermal perceptions and comfort for the same ambient temperatures.

BMC PsychologyVol. 12(1)
Argonne National Laboratory (US), Santa Fe Institute (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Illinois System (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), Washington State University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
2.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.