A multi-dimensional hierarchical evaluation system for data quality in trustworthy AI

Recently, the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) has given rise to a significant trust crisis, stemming from the persistent emergence of issues in practical applications. As a crucial component of AI, data has a profound impact on the trustworthiness of AI. Nevertheless, researchers have struggled with the challenge of rationally assessing data quality, primarily due to the scarcity of versatile and effective evaluation methods. To address this trouble, a multi-dimensional hierarchical evaluation system (MDHES) is proposed to estimate the data quality. Initially, multiple key dimensions are devised to evaluate specific data conditions separately by the calculation of individual scores. Then, the strengths and weaknesses among various dimensions can be provided a clearer understanding. Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation method, incorporating a fuzzy evaluation model, is developed to synthetically evaluate the data quality. Then, this evaluation method can achieve a dynamic balance, and meanwhile achieve a harmonious integration of subjectivity and objectivity criteria to ensure a more precise assessment result. Finally, rigorous experiment verification and comparison in both benchmark problems and real-world applications demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed MDHES, which can accurately assess data quality to provide a strong data support for the development of trustworthy AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Of Big Data
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-00999-2
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-dimensional hierarchical evaluation system for data quality in trustworthy AI

Zhe-Yuan Sun, Can-Can Chen, Q.Y. Liu, Jia Chen et al.
11 citations
Journal Of Big Data
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
3.82
article

A multi-dimensional hierarchical evaluation system for data quality in trustworthy AI

Zhe-Yuan Sun, Can-Can Chen, Q.Y. Liu, Jia Chen, Jiake Chen, Huijuan Zhang, Kai Yang, Peng Ran
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Recently, the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) has given rise to a significant trust crisis, stemming from the persistent emergence of issues in practical applications. As a crucial component of AI, data has a profound impact on the trustworthiness of AI. Nevertheless, researchers have struggled with the challenge of rationally assessing data quality, primarily due to the scarcity of versatile and effective evaluation methods. To address this trouble, a multi-dimensional hierarchical evaluation system (MDHES) is proposed to estimate the data quality. Initially, multiple key dimensions are devised to evaluate specific data conditions separately by the calculation of individual scores. Then, the strengths and weaknesses among various dimensions can be provided a clearer understanding. Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation method, incorporating a fuzzy evaluation model, is developed to synthetically evaluate the data quality. Then, this evaluation method can achieve a dynamic balance, and meanwhile achieve a harmonious integration of subjectivity and objectivity criteria to ensure a more precise assessment result. Finally, rigorous experiment verification and comparison in both benchmark problems and real-world applications demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed MDHES, which can accurately assess data quality to provide a strong data support for the development of trustworthy AI.

Journal Of Big DataVol. 11(1)
China Mobile (China) (CN), China Academy of Safety Sciences and Technology (CN), Beijing Research Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Technology (CN), Institute for the Future (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
3.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.