Work should not be killing us: Understanding the racial battle fatigue minefield for black women in higher education

Racial Battle Fatigue (RBF) has been operationalized as the cumulative psychological, physiological, and behavioral effects of racial aggressions on individuals from marginalized groups. These micro-level and macro-level aggressions have been the focus of discussion and debate at historically white colleges and universities since the 1960s when equity in higher education became a national priority because of the civil rights movement and the introduction of Critical Race Theory (CRT). Faculty teaching in Library and Information Science (LIS) programs are not exempt from RBF. In fact, there have been several testimonials of bias and racism by LIS faculty who represent marginalized populations in recent years. Research on RBF, particularly during this current politically charged climate of hate and bias adds to our understanding of the ways in which racism, in various forms, affects Black women faculty. Applying CRT, RBF, and Black feminist theoretical frameworks, the purpose of this paper is to provide a follow up to “ Racial Battle Fatigue: The unspoken burden of Black women faculty in LIS” which was published in the Journal of Education for Library and Information Science in 2019. It helps us to further understand the experiences of Black women faculty in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education for Information
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-240083
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work should not be killing us: Understanding the racial battle fatigue minefield for black women in higher education

Renate L. Chancellor
Education for Information
Higher Education Research Studies
article

Work should not be killing us: Understanding the racial battle fatigue minefield for black women in higher education

Renate L. Chancellor
article en

Abstract

Racial Battle Fatigue (RBF) has been operationalized as the cumulative psychological, physiological, and behavioral effects of racial aggressions on individuals from marginalized groups. These micro-level and macro-level aggressions have been the focus of discussion and debate at historically white colleges and universities since the 1960s when equity in higher education became a national priority because of the civil rights movement and the introduction of Critical Race Theory (CRT). Faculty teaching in Library and Information Science (LIS) programs are not exempt from RBF. In fact, there have been several testimonials of bias and racism by LIS faculty who represent marginalized populations in recent years. Research on RBF, particularly during this current politically charged climate of hate and bias adds to our understanding of the ways in which racism, in various forms, affects Black women faculty. Applying CRT, RBF, and Black feminist theoretical frameworks, the purpose of this paper is to provide a follow up to “ Racial Battle Fatigue: The unspoken burden of Black women faculty in LIS” which was published in the Journal of Education for Library and Information Science in 2019. It helps us to further understand the experiences of Black women faculty in higher education.

Education for InformationVol. 41(1)
Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.