JOINT LOW-RANK REPRESENTATION AND TRANSFER MULTI-VIEW LEARNING APPROACH FOR EEG EPILEPSY CLASSIFICATION
Classification of epileptic electroencephalograms can provide strong technical support for early warning and monitoring of epilepsy. However, Electroencephalogram (EEG) has characteristics of specificity, multi-feature, and susceptibility to noise interference. Therefore, this paper proposes a joint low-rank representation and transfer multi-view learning (LRR-TML) approach for EEG epilepsy classification. The LRR-TML approach inherits the advantages of low-rank representation, filters redundant features and noise information, and focuses on the main feature and significant feature of EEG. The LRR-TML approach introduces the ideas of transfer learning and multi-view learning on the framework of low-rank representation, mines the linear correlation between different domains in the subspace through low-rank representation, and effectively transfers the discriminative knowledge of the source domain to the target domain. According to the principles of complementarity and consistency of views, the LRR-TML approach comprehensively describes EEG by integrating various features, maximizing the consistency between different views and minimizing the divergence between views. Experimental results on the Bonn dataset show that the LRR-TML approach achieves the best classification results among all comparison approaches.
Authors
- Lei Jiao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5820-8408)
- Jiansheng Qian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1117-6453)
- HAO ZANG (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6339-8733)
- Tao Qin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5451-097X)
Institutions
- Xuzhou Medical College (CN)
- China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
- Changzhou Third People's Hospital (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology
- Published
- 2024-09-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219519424400748
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.34