REVIEW ON EVALUATION METHODS OF FRACTURE HEALING

Fracture is one of the most important health problems in people’s life. Millions of people have fractures every year. However, there is no unified standard for fracture healing in the clinic. Most definitions of complete fracture healing are subjective evaluations based on X-ray films. However, it is not reliable to evaluate the biomechanical strength of bone according to the number of callus on X-ray, and the imaging time of callus lags behind the actual callus, which is not conducive to the evaluation of early fracture healing time. In addition, although more and more fracture patients have achieved imaging healing after injury, the bone quality and bone strength of the whole body and local fracture have not returned to the normal level, and the probability of re-fracture has increased significantly, which has brought great pain to their families. Fracture healing is affected by many factors, such as age, fracture site, whether to fix the fracture site, and osteoporosis. Therefore, when evaluating the fracture healing status of patients, we should not only evaluate whether the fracture is healed but also evaluate its healing. By analyzing the previous research methods of fracture healing, in this paper, we systematically summarize the evaluation methods of fracture healing from the perspectives of computer tomography, ultrasound, bone density, biosensors, and biomechanics by analyzing previous research methods of fracture healing, aiming to provide reference for researchers in related fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219519424400645
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REVIEW ON EVALUATION METHODS OF FRACTURE HEALING

Monan Wang, Song Cui, SU GAO, Siyuan Zheng et al.
Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology
Bone fractures and treatments
article

REVIEW ON EVALUATION METHODS OF FRACTURE HEALING

Monan Wang, Song Cui, SU GAO, Siyuan Zheng, LINGBING XIA, Pengcheng Li
article en

Abstract

Fracture is one of the most important health problems in people’s life. Millions of people have fractures every year. However, there is no unified standard for fracture healing in the clinic. Most definitions of complete fracture healing are subjective evaluations based on X-ray films. However, it is not reliable to evaluate the biomechanical strength of bone according to the number of callus on X-ray, and the imaging time of callus lags behind the actual callus, which is not conducive to the evaluation of early fracture healing time. In addition, although more and more fracture patients have achieved imaging healing after injury, the bone quality and bone strength of the whole body and local fracture have not returned to the normal level, and the probability of re-fracture has increased significantly, which has brought great pain to their families. Fracture healing is affected by many factors, such as age, fracture site, whether to fix the fracture site, and osteoporosis. Therefore, when evaluating the fracture healing status of patients, we should not only evaluate whether the fracture is healed but also evaluate its healing. By analyzing the previous research methods of fracture healing, in this paper, we systematically summarize the evaluation methods of fracture healing from the perspectives of computer tomography, ultrasound, bone density, biosensors, and biomechanics by analyzing previous research methods of fracture healing, aiming to provide reference for researchers in related fields.

Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 24(09)
Harbin University of Science and Technology (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Northeast Forestry University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.