Los pasados frente al patrimonio. Arqueología durante los primeros años del Estado Plurinacional boliviano (2006-2019)

The answer to the question, heritage for whom? is usually held by States through the epistemically violent insertion of scientific-bureaucratic protocols, thought to be the only ones capable of “recognizing” heritage qualities, which replace local ways of experiencing the past. The Bolivian plurinational State, which seems to promote the decentralization of heritage management and protect local knowledge and worldviews, is no exception. This paper reviews the development of regulations linked to heritage and archaeological work during the Republic of Bolivia (1825-2006). Subsequently, we delve into the development of regulations and carry out statistical reviews on the processes of patrimonialization and issuance of authorizations for archaeological work in plurinational years to observe that the plurinational State increased its control over archaeological heritage through centralizing regulations and the notable increase in Environmental Impact Studies (EIA) to execute large extractive projects and, collaterally, heritage tourism. These activities require maintaining vertical practices that reduce the past to “heritages” reified for consumption. Next, based on some cases of ethnographic ethnography, it is suggested that many local Bolivian communities have vibrant ways of relating and constructing the past, which can oscillate with commercialized relationships such as those of community tourism. Thus, if there are possibilities for a radical transformation of heritage in Bolivia, these do not reside in the State or archaeologists but in the communities, which also do not respond to academic expectations of polarization between the indigenous and the commercial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comechingonia Revista de Arqueología
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37603/2250.7728.v.n.44650
Primary Topic
Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Los pasados frente al patrimonio. Arqueología durante los primeros años del Estado Plurinacional boliviano (2006-2019)

Salvador Arano Romero, Juan Villanueva Criales
Comechingonia Revista de Arqueología
Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
article

Los pasados frente al patrimonio. Arqueología durante los primeros años del Estado Plurinacional boliviano (2006-2019)

Salvador Arano Romero, Juan Villanueva Criales
article en

Abstract

The answer to the question, heritage for whom? is usually held by States through the epistemically violent insertion of scientific-bureaucratic protocols, thought to be the only ones capable of “recognizing” heritage qualities, which replace local ways of experiencing the past. The Bolivian plurinational State, which seems to promote the decentralization of heritage management and protect local knowledge and worldviews, is no exception. This paper reviews the development of regulations linked to heritage and archaeological work during the Republic of Bolivia (1825-2006). Subsequently, we delve into the development of regulations and carry out statistical reviews on the processes of patrimonialization and issuance of authorizations for archaeological work in plurinational years to observe that the plurinational State increased its control over archaeological heritage through centralizing regulations and the notable increase in Environmental Impact Studies (EIA) to execute large extractive projects and, collaterally, heritage tourism. These activities require maintaining vertical practices that reduce the past to “heritages” reified for consumption. Next, based on some cases of ethnographic ethnography, it is suggested that many local Bolivian communities have vibrant ways of relating and constructing the past, which can oscillate with commercialized relationships such as those of community tourism. Thus, if there are possibilities for a radical transformation of heritage in Bolivia, these do not reside in the State or archaeologists but in the communities, which also do not respond to academic expectations of polarization between the indigenous and the commercial.

Comechingonia Revista de ArqueologíaVol. 28(3)
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (DE), Museo Nacional de Etnografía y Folklore (BO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.