Enacted or idealistic co-operative values?
Co-operatives differ from other forms of business due to their strong values-based nature, but it is nevertheless recognized that there is a significant gap between international co-operative values and the practical management of co-operatives. According to the values base, management naturally requires that co-operatives as organizations have a common sensemaking of co-operative values. With this present research, we create a deep understanding of how the managers of large co-operatives make sense of the values related to the co-operative ideology. As a result of our qualitative empirical research, we present how Finnish managers of large co-operatives understand the values-based nature of co-operatives in two ways – enacted and idealistic – and construct an ideology of co-operatives around four values: equality, financial responsibility, democracy, and regional responsibility. At the co-operative level, the understanding of values is constructed as a shared, incongruous, partially shared, and contradictory sensemakings. The findings reveal that the values-based nature of co-operatives is recognized but that it is tense and fragmented, and we suggest strengthening management training and information to members to strengthen the unique identity of co-operatives. • The co-op's ideology is seen as based on equality, financial/regional responsibility, and democracy. • The values are understood to be classified as enacted or idealistic. • The sensemaking processes based on these values are seen as shared or contradictory. • No coherent sensemaking exists regarding the value-based nature of co-operatives.
Authors
- Anu Puusa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8083-1028)
- Sanna Saastamoinen
Institutions
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management
- Published
- 2024-09-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2024.100248
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Management and Organizational Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.02