Evaluating labour market–educational programme fit: A case study on aligning supply and demand for competences using a generic approach

There is a long-standing debate within academia and practice on how specific educational programmes and educational systems, in general, prepare students for the labour market after graduation. This article contributes to this debate by exploring to what extend Bloom’s revised taxonomy (BRT) can be used to investigate the degree of alignment between the demand of the Danish labour market and the supply of competences. We present a generic method for evaluating labour market–educational programme fit that can be used across educational programmes. This method is developed and tested in a case study in which BRT is used to investigate the alignment between the curriculum and labour market demand for skills, knowledge, and compe-tences. We compare the curriculum of the multimedia design programme with relevant job advertisements. This comparison involves a qualitative analysis of both the programme’s learning goals and the advertisements’ content based on qualitative and abductive coding. We identify areas of misalignment and discuss how the educational programme can use the information to align the supply with the demand for competences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458x.241441
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating labour market–educational programme fit: A case study on aligning supply and demand for competences using a generic approach

Laura Cordes Felby, Sune Dueholm Müller, Morten Mathiasen, Jon Nielsen et al.
Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Higher Education Learning Practices
article

Evaluating labour market–educational programme fit: A case study on aligning supply and demand for competences using a generic approach

Laura Cordes Felby, Sune Dueholm Müller, Morten Mathiasen, Jon Nielsen, Anna Skouboe Roesen
article en

Abstract

There is a long-standing debate within academia and practice on how specific educational programmes and educational systems, in general, prepare students for the labour market after graduation. This article contributes to this debate by exploring to what extend Bloom’s revised taxonomy (BRT) can be used to investigate the degree of alignment between the demand of the Danish labour market and the supply of competences. We present a generic method for evaluating labour market–educational programme fit that can be used across educational programmes. This method is developed and tested in a case study in which BRT is used to investigate the alignment between the curriculum and labour market demand for skills, knowledge, and compe-tences. We compare the curriculum of the multimedia design programme with relevant job advertisements. This comparison involves a qualitative analysis of both the programme’s learning goals and the advertisements’ content based on qualitative and abductive coding. We identify areas of misalignment and discuss how the educational programme can use the information to align the supply with the demand for competences.

Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and TrainingVol. 14(4)
University of Oslo (NO), Aarhus University (DK), Business Academy Aarhus (DK), Erhvervsakademi MidtVest (DK), Centre for Research and Development (ZW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Higher Education Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.