Identifying ordinal categories for the Water Insecurity Experiences Scales

ABSTRACT The Household Water Insecurity Experiences (HWISE) and Individual Water Insecurity Experiences (IWISE) Scales are globally suitable tools for comparably measuring water insecurity experiences among households and adults, respectively. The potential range for HWISE and IWISE scores is 0–36. When the WISE Scales were first published, scores of 12 and higher were considered indicative of water insecurity, but additional cut-points are needed to provide more nuanced insights. We therefore sought to develop a practical set of cut-points for the WISE Scales using HWISE data from 13 sites across 12 countries (n = 3,293) and nationally representative samples of IWISE data from 38 countries collected by the Gallup World Poll (n = 52,343). We selected cut-points in water insecurity scores to establish four ordinal categories: no-to-marginal (0–2), low (3–11), moderate (12–23), and high (24–36) water insecurity. These categories were monotonically associated with increasing odds of reporting water dissatisfaction and helped to differentiate the breadth of water insecurity across populations with heterogenous water insecurity experiences and frequencies. These four water insecurity categories can be used to better understand how water insecurity may be related to livelihoods, health, and well-being, both at low and high water insecurity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2024.042
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Korean Urban and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying ordinal categories for the Water Insecurity Experiences Scales

Joshua D. Miller, Edward A. Frongillo, Sera L. Young, Hilary J. Bethancourt
14 citations
Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
Korean Urban and Social Studies
9.94
article

Identifying ordinal categories for the Water Insecurity Experiences Scales

Joshua D. Miller, Edward A. Frongillo, Sera L. Young, Hilary J. Bethancourt
article en
14 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Household Water Insecurity Experiences (HWISE) and Individual Water Insecurity Experiences (IWISE) Scales are globally suitable tools for comparably measuring water insecurity experiences among households and adults, respectively. The potential range for HWISE and IWISE scores is 0–36. When the WISE Scales were first published, scores of 12 and higher were considered indicative of water insecurity, but additional cut-points are needed to provide more nuanced insights. We therefore sought to develop a practical set of cut-points for the WISE Scales using HWISE data from 13 sites across 12 countries (n = 3,293) and nationally representative samples of IWISE data from 38 countries collected by the Gallup World Poll (n = 52,343). We selected cut-points in water insecurity scores to establish four ordinal categories: no-to-marginal (0–2), low (3–11), moderate (12–23), and high (24–36) water insecurity. These categories were monotonically associated with increasing odds of reporting water dissatisfaction and helped to differentiate the breadth of water insecurity across populations with heterogenous water insecurity experiences and frequencies. These four water insecurity categories can be used to better understand how water insecurity may be related to livelihoods, health, and well-being, both at low and high water insecurity.

Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for DevelopmentVol. 14(11)
Northwestern University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of South Carolina (US)
National Science Foundation, Carnegie Corporation of New York, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, University of Miami, Northwestern University, Johns Hopkins University, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Innovative Methods and Metrics for Agriculture and Nutrition Actions, Leverhulme Trust, Lloyd's Register, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Korean Urban and Social Studies
9.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.