“Moral spaces”: A feasibility study to build nurses’ ethical confidence and competence

<b>Background:</b> Pre-licensure ethics nursing education does not adequately prepare and instill confidence in nurses to address ethical issues, and yet ethics education provides nurses with greater confidence to take moral action, which can mitigate the negative effects of moral distress.<b>Objectives:</b> To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a nursing ethics education programme that included simulated case-based ethics competencies as a form of evaluation. The programme aimed at building nurses' ethical knowledge and confidence to respond to ethical challenges in practice.<b>Research design:</b> A prospective, longitudinal, correlational, single-cohort feasibility study using an investigator-developed survey and intervention field data.<b>Participants and research context:</b> Registered nurses were recruited from an academic quaternary-care medical center and 9 small- to mid-sized regional hospitals within one health system in the Midwest United States.<b>Ethical considerations:</b> IRB approval was obtained. Participants could complete the educational programme regardless of research process participation.<b>Findings:</b> Of 20 participants, 19 (95%) provided post-programme surveys and 18 completed competencies. Median (IQR) scores with quartiles for scheduling, timing, and length of sessions were all 10.0 [9.0, 10.0], and participants perceived that the content was interesting, increased knowledge and confidence in ethics, increased skills in providing ethical care, and would recommend the programme to colleagues. Of factors, an increase in ethics knowledge had the highest "always agree" (17, 89.5%) response. Most participants reported that ethics competencies were appropriate 9.0 [9.0, 10.0] and sufficiently challenging 10.0 [9.0, 10.0].<b>Discussion:</b> The education programme developed nurses' ethics knowledge and confidence. The single-cohort feasibility design provided early-stage intervention outcomes; however, a larger randomized controlled trial would substantiate programme value.<b>Conclusion:</b> This novel ethics education programme was highly feasible and acceptable to hospital-based nurses who reported increased knowledge and confidence in providing ethical care. Simulated case-based ethics competencies were an appropriate evaluation method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241284356
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Moral spaces”: A feasibility study to build nurses’ ethical confidence and competence

Julia Gorecki, Dianna Jo Copley, Rosemary Field, James Bena et al.
3 citations
Nursing Ethics
Ethics in medical practice
2.55
article

“Moral spaces”: A feasibility study to build nurses’ ethical confidence and competence

Julia Gorecki, Dianna Jo Copley, Rosemary Field, James Bena, Georgina Morley, Nancy M. Albert, Cristie Cole Horsburgh, Shannon L. Morrison
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Pre-licensure ethics nursing education does not adequately prepare and instill confidence in nurses to address ethical issues, and yet ethics education provides nurses with greater confidence to take moral action, which can mitigate the negative effects of moral distress.<b>Objectives:</b> To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a nursing ethics education programme that included simulated case-based ethics competencies as a form of evaluation. The programme aimed at building nurses' ethical knowledge and confidence to respond to ethical challenges in practice.<b>Research design:</b> A prospective, longitudinal, correlational, single-cohort feasibility study using an investigator-developed survey and intervention field data.<b>Participants and research context:</b> Registered nurses were recruited from an academic quaternary-care medical center and 9 small- to mid-sized regional hospitals within one health system in the Midwest United States.<b>Ethical considerations:</b> IRB approval was obtained. Participants could complete the educational programme regardless of research process participation.<b>Findings:</b> Of 20 participants, 19 (95%) provided post-programme surveys and 18 completed competencies. Median (IQR) scores with quartiles for scheduling, timing, and length of sessions were all 10.0 [9.0, 10.0], and participants perceived that the content was interesting, increased knowledge and confidence in ethics, increased skills in providing ethical care, and would recommend the programme to colleagues. Of factors, an increase in ethics knowledge had the highest "always agree" (17, 89.5%) response. Most participants reported that ethics competencies were appropriate 9.0 [9.0, 10.0] and sufficiently challenging 10.0 [9.0, 10.0].<b>Discussion:</b> The education programme developed nurses' ethics knowledge and confidence. The single-cohort feasibility design provided early-stage intervention outcomes; however, a larger randomized controlled trial would substantiate programme value.<b>Conclusion:</b> This novel ethics education programme was highly feasible and acceptable to hospital-based nurses who reported increased knowledge and confidence in providing ethical care. Simulated case-based ethics competencies were an appropriate evaluation method.

Nursing EthicsVol. 32(3)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Stanley Medical College (IN), Quantitative BioSciences (US), Center for Practical Bioethics (US), Center for Clinical Research (United States) (US), Cleveland Clinic Akron General (US), Marymount University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics in medical practice
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.