Factors influencing the choice to declare CSR reporting stand-ards: Evidence from Baltic public companies

Research background: Recently, companies have been increasingly focusing on social responsibility and disclosure. They use a variety of standards to disclose their social responsibility. The prevalence of these practices varies between companies in different countries. In addition, some companies declare CSR reporting standards, while others do not. Stakeholders need to know the characteristics of companies that declare CSR reporting standards. Purpose of the article: This study aims to reveal the factors influencing the choice to declare CSR reporting standards in Baltic public companies. Methods: The choice to declare CSR reporting standards is measured by the fact of CSR reporting standards’ declaration and the choice of GRI. The data for dependent variables are collected from non-financial reporting of Baltic public companies by making the content analysis. Company visibility, financial performance, and market expectations are chosen as independent variables. Their data is obtained from the Bloomberg database. Logistic regression models are applied. Findings & value added: Only half of the companies surveyed disclosed the CSR reporting standards used. Estonian public companies prefer GRI standards, and Lithuanian public companies prefer GRI plus UNGC. CSR reporting standards tend to be declared by those public companies that are larger and operate in the “heavy industry” as well as have higher EPS and lower ROA and CAPI. Market expectations are irrelevant to the disclosure of CSR reporting standards. By contrast, GRI standards are used and disclosed by public companies with the same characteristics as those declaring the standards. Still, in this case, age and market expectations are also important factors. Younger and higher market-value companies tend to choose GRI standards. These results reflect managerial behavior based on legitimacy, stakeholder, and signaling theories. Our findings are important to investors, market regulators, policymakers, managers and shareholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Equilibrium Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3241
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing the choice to declare CSR reporting stand-ards: Evidence from Baltic public companies

Dalia Juočiūnienė, Vilija Aleknevičienė, Danutė Zinkevičienė
2 citations
Equilibrium Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
1.11
article

Factors influencing the choice to declare CSR reporting stand-ards: Evidence from Baltic public companies

Dalia Juočiūnienė, Vilija Aleknevičienė, Danutė Zinkevičienė
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Research background: Recently, companies have been increasingly focusing on social responsibility and disclosure. They use a variety of standards to disclose their social responsibility. The prevalence of these practices varies between companies in different countries. In addition, some companies declare CSR reporting standards, while others do not. Stakeholders need to know the characteristics of companies that declare CSR reporting standards. Purpose of the article: This study aims to reveal the factors influencing the choice to declare CSR reporting standards in Baltic public companies. Methods: The choice to declare CSR reporting standards is measured by the fact of CSR reporting standards’ declaration and the choice of GRI. The data for dependent variables are collected from non-financial reporting of Baltic public companies by making the content analysis. Company visibility, financial performance, and market expectations are chosen as independent variables. Their data is obtained from the Bloomberg database. Logistic regression models are applied. Findings & value added: Only half of the companies surveyed disclosed the CSR reporting standards used. Estonian public companies prefer GRI standards, and Lithuanian public companies prefer GRI plus UNGC. CSR reporting standards tend to be declared by those public companies that are larger and operate in the “heavy industry” as well as have higher EPS and lower ROA and CAPI. Market expectations are irrelevant to the disclosure of CSR reporting standards. By contrast, GRI standards are used and disclosed by public companies with the same characteristics as those declaring the standards. Still, in this case, age and market expectations are also important factors. Younger and higher market-value companies tend to choose GRI standards. These results reflect managerial behavior based on legitimacy, stakeholder, and signaling theories. Our findings are important to investors, market regulators, policymakers, managers and shareholders.

Equilibrium Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic PolicyVol. 19(3)
Vytautas Magnus University (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.