Shareholder Activism and the Deterrence Effect of Democratic Politician Shareholders

Firms strategically establish political connections in the hopes of obtaining access to resources and opportunities controlled by the state. However, little is known about benefits that may accrue to firms from ties with politician shareholders. We explore potential spillover benefits of such ties in the context of financially motivated shareholder activism (“financial activism”). Specifically, we examine whether financial activists are deterred from targeting firms owned by Democratic politicians, who tend to adopt a more interventionist and stakeholder-oriented stance toward economic regulation than Republicans. Based upon an analysis of S&P 1500 firms over a 15-year period, we find that the number of Democratic politician shareholders is negatively associated with a firm’s likelihood of being targeted by a financial activist. This relationship is stronger when Democratic politician shareholders are more publicly prominent and when firms have more Democratic-leaning boards. Our study shows that the benefits firms derive from politician shareholders spill over beyond the business-government interface into the domain of corporate governance. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17495 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization Science
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17495
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shareholder Activism and the Deterrence Effect of Democratic Politician Shareholders

Mark R. DesJardine, Wei Shi, Timothy Werner
3 citations
Organization Science
Corporate Finance and Governance
2.84
article

Shareholder Activism and the Deterrence Effect of Democratic Politician Shareholders

Mark R. DesJardine, Wei Shi, Timothy Werner
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Firms strategically establish political connections in the hopes of obtaining access to resources and opportunities controlled by the state. However, little is known about benefits that may accrue to firms from ties with politician shareholders. We explore potential spillover benefits of such ties in the context of financially motivated shareholder activism (“financial activism”). Specifically, we examine whether financial activists are deterred from targeting firms owned by Democratic politicians, who tend to adopt a more interventionist and stakeholder-oriented stance toward economic regulation than Republicans. Based upon an analysis of S&P 1500 firms over a 15-year period, we find that the number of Democratic politician shareholders is negatively associated with a firm’s likelihood of being targeted by a financial activist. This relationship is stronger when Democratic politician shareholders are more publicly prominent and when firms have more Democratic-leaning boards. Our study shows that the benefits firms derive from politician shareholders spill over beyond the business-government interface into the domain of corporate governance. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17495 .

Organization ScienceVol. 36(2)
Dartmouth College (US), University of Miami (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Finance and Governance
2.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.