Diagonalization Games

We study several variants of a combinatorial game which is based on Cantor’s diagonal argument. The game is between two players called Kronecker and Cantor. The names of the players are motivated by the known fact that Leopold Kronecker did not appreciate Georg Cantor’s arguments about the infinite, and even referred to him as a “scientific charlatan.” In the game Kronecker maintains a list of m binary vectors, each of length n, and Cantor’s goal is to produce a new binary vector which is different from each of Kronecker’s vectors, or prove that no such vector exists. Cantor does not see Kronecker’s vectors but he is allowed to ask queries of the form What is bit number j of vector number i? What is the minimal number of queries with which Cantor can achieve his goal? How much better can Cantor do if he is allowed to pick his queries adaptively, based on Kronecker’s previous replies? The case when m = n is solved by diagonalization using n (nonadaptive) queries. We study this game more generally, and prove an optimal bound in the adaptive case and nearly tight upper and lower bounds in the nonadaptive case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Mathematical Monthly
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2024.2393992
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagonalization Games

Kasper Green Larsen, Olivier Bousquet, Shay Moran, Noga Alon et al.
American Mathematical Monthly
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Diagonalization Games

Kasper Green Larsen, Olivier Bousquet, Shay Moran, Noga Alon, Shlomo Moran
article en

Abstract

We study several variants of a combinatorial game which is based on Cantor’s diagonal argument. The game is between two players called Kronecker and Cantor. The names of the players are motivated by the known fact that Leopold Kronecker did not appreciate Georg Cantor’s arguments about the infinite, and even referred to him as a “scientific charlatan.” In the game Kronecker maintains a list of m binary vectors, each of length n, and Cantor’s goal is to produce a new binary vector which is different from each of Kronecker’s vectors, or prove that no such vector exists. Cantor does not see Kronecker’s vectors but he is allowed to ask queries of the form What is bit number j of vector number i? What is the minimal number of queries with which Cantor can achieve his goal? How much better can Cantor do if he is allowed to pick his queries adaptively, based on Kronecker’s previous replies? The case when m = n is solved by diagonalization using n (nonadaptive) queries. We study this game more generally, and prove an optimal bound in the adaptive case and nearly tight upper and lower bounds in the nonadaptive case.

American Mathematical MonthlyVol. 131(10)
Aarhus University (DK)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diagonalization Games — Kasper Green Larsen, Olivier Bousquet, et al. · American Mathematical Monthly (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS