Exploring Saliency Bias in Manipulation Detection

The social media-fuelled explosion of fake news and misinformation supported by tampered images has led to growth in the development of models and datasets for image manipulation detection. However, existing detection methods mostly treat media objects in isolation, without considering the impact of specific manipulations on viewer perception. Forensic datasets are usually analyzed based on the manipulation operations and corresponding pixel-based masks, but not on the semantics of the manipulation, i.e., type of scene, objects, and viewers’ attention to scene content. The semantics of the manipulation play an important role in spreading misinformation through manipulated images. In an attempt to encourage further development of semantic-aware forensic approaches to understand visual misinformation, we propose a framework to analyze the trends of visual and semantic saliency in popular image manipulation datasets and their impact on detection. https://github.com/CV-Lehigh/Bias_IMD

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icip51287.2024.10648063
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Saliency Bias in Manipulation Detection

Alan Bettis, Joshua Krinsky, Aparna Bharati, Daniel Moreira et al.
2 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
article

Exploring Saliency Bias in Manipulation Detection

Alan Bettis, Joshua Krinsky, Aparna Bharati, Daniel Moreira, Qiuyu Tang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The social media-fuelled explosion of fake news and misinformation supported by tampered images has led to growth in the development of models and datasets for image manipulation detection. However, existing detection methods mostly treat media objects in isolation, without considering the impact of specific manipulations on viewer perception. Forensic datasets are usually analyzed based on the manipulation operations and corresponding pixel-based masks, but not on the semantics of the manipulation, i.e., type of scene, objects, and viewers’ attention to scene content. The semantics of the manipulation play an important role in spreading misinformation through manipulated images. In an attempt to encourage further development of semantic-aware forensic approaches to understand visual misinformation, we propose a framework to analyze the trends of visual and semantic saliency in popular image manipulation datasets and their impact on detection. https://github.com/CV-Lehigh/Bias_IMD

Lehigh University (US), Loyola University Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring Saliency Bias in Manipulation Detection — Alan Bettis, Joshua Krinsky, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS