Learning With Instance-Dependent Noisy Labels By Anchor Hallucination And Hard Sample Label Correction

Learning from noisy-labeled data is crucial for real-world applications. Traditional Noisy-Label Learning (NLL) methods categorize training data into clean and noisy sets based on the loss distribution of training samples. However, they often neglect that clean samples, especially those with intricate visual patterns, may also yield substantial losses. This oversight is particularly significant in datasets with Instance-Dependent Noise (IDN), where mislabeling probabilities correlate with visual appearance. Our approach explicitly distinguishes between clean $v s$. noisy and easy $v s$. hard samples. We identify training samples with small losses, assuming they have simple patterns and correct labels. Utilizing these easy samples, we hallucinate multiple anchors to select hard samples for label correction. Corrected hard samples, along with the easy samples, are used as labeled data in subsequent semi-supervised training. Experiments on synthetic and real-world IDN datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our method over other state-of-the-art NLL methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icip51287.2024.10648232
Primary Topic
Image Processing Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning With Instance-Dependent Noisy Labels By Anchor Hallucination And Hard Sample Label Correction

Ming‐Ching Chang, Po-Hsuan Huang, Chia-Ching Lin, Chih-Fan Hsu et al.
Image Processing Techniques and Applications
article

Learning With Instance-Dependent Noisy Labels By Anchor Hallucination And Hard Sample Label Correction

Ming‐Ching Chang, Po-Hsuan Huang, Chia-Ching Lin, Chih-Fan Hsu, Wei-Chao Chen
article en

Abstract

Learning from noisy-labeled data is crucial for real-world applications. Traditional Noisy-Label Learning (NLL) methods categorize training data into clean and noisy sets based on the loss distribution of training samples. However, they often neglect that clean samples, especially those with intricate visual patterns, may also yield substantial losses. This oversight is particularly significant in datasets with Instance-Dependent Noise (IDN), where mislabeling probabilities correlate with visual appearance. Our approach explicitly distinguishes between clean $v s$. noisy and easy $v s$. hard samples. We identify training samples with small losses, assuming they have simple patterns and correct labels. Utilizing these easy samples, we hallucinate multiple anchors to select hard samples for label correction. Corrected hard samples, along with the easy samples, are used as labeled data in subsequent semi-supervised training. Experiments on synthetic and real-world IDN datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our method over other state-of-the-art NLL methods.

Albany State University (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), Inventec (Taiwan) (TW)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Image Processing Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Learning With Instance-Dependent Noisy Labels By Anchor Hallucination And Hard Sample Label Correction — Ming‐Ching Chang, Po-Hsuan Huang, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS