Never Just a Choice: Three Theoretical Approaches to Economic Constraints on Family Formation

This article attempts to understand how economic realities influence decisions around partnership commitment and raising children for US people, whether poor or well-off. Critical realist social theory, reproductive justice, and the Catholic documentary tradition on families all assist in understanding these realities and articulating solutions to the challenges they pose. While the three approaches share surprising common ground, none of the three succeeds in isolation at describing pursuit of the human good of family formation by persons who are themselves socially constituted, as are the options from which they choose. That each of these theoretical approaches recommends similar political responses to family formation serves to highlight critical distinctions between the affordances and drawbacks of each approach. Reading these traditions in concert reveals a discrepancy between the ways Catholic tradition understands economic constraints on family formation and the way present US church leadership responds to them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Moral Theology
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55476/001c.124018
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Never Just a Choice: Three Theoretical Approaches to Economic Constraints on Family Formation

Kate Ward
Journal of Moral Theology
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
article

Never Just a Choice: Three Theoretical Approaches to Economic Constraints on Family Formation

Kate Ward
article en

Abstract

This article attempts to understand how economic realities influence decisions around partnership commitment and raising children for US people, whether poor or well-off. Critical realist social theory, reproductive justice, and the Catholic documentary tradition on families all assist in understanding these realities and articulating solutions to the challenges they pose. While the three approaches share surprising common ground, none of the three succeeds in isolation at describing pursuit of the human good of family formation by persons who are themselves socially constituted, as are the options from which they choose. That each of these theoretical approaches recommends similar political responses to family formation serves to highlight critical distinctions between the affordances and drawbacks of each approach. Reading these traditions in concert reveals a discrepancy between the ways Catholic tradition understands economic constraints on family formation and the way present US church leadership responds to them.

Journal of Moral TheologyVol. 6(CTEWC Book Series 6)
Marquette University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.