A framework for modal split and implications on transport growth and travel time savings

Mobility is one of the most debated issues in the current discussion on transport policies and the climate change. Related indicators are the modal split, transport growth and travel time savings, used for travel behaviour evaluations. In official transport statistics, the modal split is generally used in two ways, according to the number of modal trips and to the modal trip length. Although they are usually used separately, we will show that they are directly connected, where the latter is a weighted version of the former. The introduction of the reference units of “person” and “day” overcomes the limitations of a trip-based definition and extends the ansatz to a mobility-based methodology, where all modal combinations can be considered. Empirical data analysis shows, that transport growth is founded on the increase of individual motorised transport at the disadvantage of pedestrians, whereas other modes remain fairly stable. Daily travel time generally increases especially with individual motorised transport in comparison to non-motorised modes, which shows an inconsistency, for example, for some assumptions or approaches of travel time savings. The proposed methodology does not require any prior assumptions and provides therefore a simple and general applicability. The data analysis is based on national travel survey data from Germany, Switzerland, UK and USA from the 1970-ies up to 2018. One main result of the paper is a frame of reference for the relativity of mobility behaviour, which consistently connects these mobility indicators. • Using modal split definition and developed new functions for mobility behaviour. • Introducing reference units of person and time for a framework for mobility. • The frame of reference provides the basis for a new definition of mobility behaviour. • Further extensions are introduced to transport growth and travel time savings. • A systematic consistency and complementarity is obtained between the mobility indicators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transport Policy
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.09.016
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for modal split and implications on transport growth and travel time savings

Martin Kozek, Robert Kölbl, Stefan Jakubek
3 citations
Transport Policy
Transportation Planning and Optimization
2.05
article

A framework for modal split and implications on transport growth and travel time savings

Martin Kozek, Robert Kölbl, Stefan Jakubek
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Mobility is one of the most debated issues in the current discussion on transport policies and the climate change. Related indicators are the modal split, transport growth and travel time savings, used for travel behaviour evaluations. In official transport statistics, the modal split is generally used in two ways, according to the number of modal trips and to the modal trip length. Although they are usually used separately, we will show that they are directly connected, where the latter is a weighted version of the former. The introduction of the reference units of “person” and “day” overcomes the limitations of a trip-based definition and extends the ansatz to a mobility-based methodology, where all modal combinations can be considered. Empirical data analysis shows, that transport growth is founded on the increase of individual motorised transport at the disadvantage of pedestrians, whereas other modes remain fairly stable. Daily travel time generally increases especially with individual motorised transport in comparison to non-motorised modes, which shows an inconsistency, for example, for some assumptions or approaches of travel time savings. The proposed methodology does not require any prior assumptions and provides therefore a simple and general applicability. The data analysis is based on national travel survey data from Germany, Switzerland, UK and USA from the 1970-ies up to 2018. One main result of the paper is a frame of reference for the relativity of mobility behaviour, which consistently connects these mobility indicators. • Using modal split definition and developed new functions for mobility behaviour. • Introducing reference units of person and time for a framework for mobility. • The frame of reference provides the basis for a new definition of mobility behaviour. • Further extensions are introduced to transport growth and travel time savings. • A systematic consistency and complementarity is obtained between the mobility indicators.

Transport PolicyVol. 158
TU Wien (AT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A framework for modal split and implications on transport growth and travel time savings — Martin Kozek, Robert Kölbl, et al. · Transport Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS