Decreased perceptual sensitivity during attention shifts

Both saccades and attention shifts are cognitive mechanisms for relocating the focus of information processing to different spatial locations. While it is known that visual sensitivity decreases during saccades (i.e., saccadic suppression) to support stable visual experience, here we asked whether attention shifts would also cause reduced perceptual sensitivity. In Experiment 1, we measured phases of the rhythmic spontaneous shift of attention between two task-relevant locations. To estimate the perceptual sensitivity at different attention states, a task-irrelevant visual probe was presented in the background at varying phases of attention oscillation, and the amplitudes of pupil constrictions induced by the probe were measured. Results showed a reduction in pupil constriction during attention shifts, indicating a decrease in perceptual sensitivity. Additional tests with a single-location attention task revealed an absence of modulation of pupil constriction, confirming that the reduced sensitivity was due to attention shifts and not to rhythmic attention sampling. In Experiment 2, instead of relying on pupil constriction, MEG responses to the probe stimulus were used to estimate the perceptual sensitivity during attention shifts. The experimental design was similar to that used in Experiment 1, and the results showed a decrease in MEG responses in the occipital region during attention shifts. Further analysis identified that the modulation of MEG response peaked around 150-200 ms after the probe onset, indicating that the modulation occurs at a late stage compared to that in the saccadic suppression. Additionally, a whole-brain analysis revealed that the decreased response was primarily located in the parietal region. Taken together, our findings suggest that attention shifts over space are accompanied by decreases in visual sensitivity, likely due to suppressive top-down modulation from the parietal attention network to the early visual cortex.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.368
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decreased perceptual sensitivity during attention shifts

Zixiao Zhang, Jiedong Zhang, Sheng He
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Decreased perceptual sensitivity during attention shifts

Zixiao Zhang, Jiedong Zhang, Sheng He
article en

Abstract

Both saccades and attention shifts are cognitive mechanisms for relocating the focus of information processing to different spatial locations. While it is known that visual sensitivity decreases during saccades (i.e., saccadic suppression) to support stable visual experience, here we asked whether attention shifts would also cause reduced perceptual sensitivity. In Experiment 1, we measured phases of the rhythmic spontaneous shift of attention between two task-relevant locations. To estimate the perceptual sensitivity at different attention states, a task-irrelevant visual probe was presented in the background at varying phases of attention oscillation, and the amplitudes of pupil constrictions induced by the probe were measured. Results showed a reduction in pupil constriction during attention shifts, indicating a decrease in perceptual sensitivity. Additional tests with a single-location attention task revealed an absence of modulation of pupil constriction, confirming that the reduced sensitivity was due to attention shifts and not to rhythmic attention sampling. In Experiment 2, instead of relying on pupil constriction, MEG responses to the probe stimulus were used to estimate the perceptual sensitivity during attention shifts. The experimental design was similar to that used in Experiment 1, and the results showed a decrease in MEG responses in the occipital region during attention shifts. Further analysis identified that the modulation of MEG response peaked around 150-200 ms after the probe onset, indicating that the modulation occurs at a late stage compared to that in the saccadic suppression. Additionally, a whole-brain analysis revealed that the decreased response was primarily located in the parietal region. Taken together, our findings suggest that attention shifts over space are accompanied by decreases in visual sensitivity, likely due to suppressive top-down modulation from the parietal attention network to the early visual cortex.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Biophysics (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.