Metacognition in Putative Magno- and Parvocellular Vision

A major distinction in early visual processing is the magnocellular (MC) and parvocellular (PC) pathways. The MC pathway tends to process motion, transient events, and low spatial frequencies, while the PC pathway mostly processes color, sustained events, and high spatial frequencies. Prior work suggests that the PC pathway more strongly contributes to conscious object recognition via projections to the ventral “what” visual pathway, whereas the MC pathway contributes to non-conscious motion and localization processing via the dorsal stream “where/how” pathway. This invites the question: Are we equally aware of activity in both pathways? And if not, do task demands interact with which pathway is more accessible to awareness? We investigated this question in a set of two studies measuring participant’s metacognition (their ability to judge the accuracy of their own perceptual decisions) for stimuli biased towards MC or PC processing. The “Steady/Pulsed Paradigm” presents brief, near-threshold stimuli under two conditions thought to favor either pathway. In the “pulsed” condition, the target appears atop a brief luminance pedestal which theoretically saturates the transient MC response and leaves the PC pathway to process the stimulus. In the “steady” condition, the stimulus is identical except the luminance pedestal is constant throughout the trial, rather than flashed along with the target. This theoretically adapts the PC neurons and leaves MC for processing. Experiment 1 was a spatial localization task thought to rely on information relayed from the MC pathway. Using a model-based approach to quantify participants’ metacognition about their task performance, we found higher metacognition in the steady (MC-biased) condition. Experiment 2 was an orientation-discrimination task more reliant on PC pathway information. Preliminary results show an abolishment of the MC pathway advantage seen in experiment 1 and suggests that the metacognitive advantage for MC processing may hold for stimulus localization tasks only. (edited)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.469
Primary Topic
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metacognition in Putative Magno- and Parvocellular Vision

Jason Samaha, April Pilipenko, Vrishab Nukala, Jessica De La Torre
Journal of Vision
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
article

Metacognition in Putative Magno- and Parvocellular Vision

Jason Samaha, April Pilipenko, Vrishab Nukala, Jessica De La Torre
article en

Abstract

A major distinction in early visual processing is the magnocellular (MC) and parvocellular (PC) pathways. The MC pathway tends to process motion, transient events, and low spatial frequencies, while the PC pathway mostly processes color, sustained events, and high spatial frequencies. Prior work suggests that the PC pathway more strongly contributes to conscious object recognition via projections to the ventral “what” visual pathway, whereas the MC pathway contributes to non-conscious motion and localization processing via the dorsal stream “where/how” pathway. This invites the question: Are we equally aware of activity in both pathways? And if not, do task demands interact with which pathway is more accessible to awareness? We investigated this question in a set of two studies measuring participant’s metacognition (their ability to judge the accuracy of their own perceptual decisions) for stimuli biased towards MC or PC processing. The “Steady/Pulsed Paradigm” presents brief, near-threshold stimuli under two conditions thought to favor either pathway. In the “pulsed” condition, the target appears atop a brief luminance pedestal which theoretically saturates the transient MC response and leaves the PC pathway to process the stimulus. In the “steady” condition, the stimulus is identical except the luminance pedestal is constant throughout the trial, rather than flashed along with the target. This theoretically adapts the PC neurons and leaves MC for processing. Experiment 1 was a spatial localization task thought to rely on information relayed from the MC pathway. Using a model-based approach to quantify participants’ metacognition about their task performance, we found higher metacognition in the steady (MC-biased) condition. Experiment 2 was an orientation-discrimination task more reliant on PC pathway information. Preliminary results show an abolishment of the MC pathway advantage seen in experiment 1 and suggests that the metacognitive advantage for MC processing may hold for stimulus localization tasks only. (edited)

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of California, Santa Cruz (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.