Neural Responses to Natural Versus AI-generated Affective Images

The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) contains 1,182 well-characterized photographs depicting natural scenes varying in affective content. These pictures are used extensively in affective neuroscience to investigate the neural correlates of emotional processing. Recently, in an effort to augment this dataset, we have begun to generate synthetic emotional images by combining IAPS pictures and diffusion-based AI models. The goal of this study is to compare the neural responses to IAPS pictures and matching AI-generated images. The stimulus set consisted of 60 IAPS pictures (20 pleasant, 20 neutral, 20 unpleasant) and 60 matching AI-generated images (20 pleasant, 20 neutral, 20 unpleasant). In a recording session, a total of 30 IAPS pictures and 30 matching AI-generated images were presented in random order, where each image was displayed for 3 seconds with neighboring images being separated by an interval of 2.8 to 3.5 seconds. Each experiment consisted of 10 recording sessions. The fMRI data was recorded on a 3T Siemens Prisma scanner. Pupil responses to image presentation were monitored using an MRI-compatible eyetracker. Our preliminary analysis of the fMRI data (N=3) showed that IAPS pictures and matching AI-generated images evoked similar neural responses in the visual cortex. In particular, MVPA (Multivariate Pattern Analysis) classifiers built to decode emotional categories from neural responses to IAPS pictures can be used to decode emotional categories from neural responses to AI-generated images and vice versa. Efforts to confirm these findings are underway by recruiting additional participants. Analysis is also being expanded to include the comparison of such measures as functional connectivity and pupillometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.473
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural Responses to Natural Versus AI-generated Affective Images

Ruogu Fang, Ethan Smith, Mingzhou Ding, Andreas Keil et al.
Journal of Vision
Face Recognition and Perception
article

Neural Responses to Natural Versus AI-generated Affective Images

Ruogu Fang, Ethan Smith, Mingzhou Ding, Andreas Keil, Faith Gilbert, Yu-Jung Chen
article en

Abstract

The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) contains 1,182 well-characterized photographs depicting natural scenes varying in affective content. These pictures are used extensively in affective neuroscience to investigate the neural correlates of emotional processing. Recently, in an effort to augment this dataset, we have begun to generate synthetic emotional images by combining IAPS pictures and diffusion-based AI models. The goal of this study is to compare the neural responses to IAPS pictures and matching AI-generated images. The stimulus set consisted of 60 IAPS pictures (20 pleasant, 20 neutral, 20 unpleasant) and 60 matching AI-generated images (20 pleasant, 20 neutral, 20 unpleasant). In a recording session, a total of 30 IAPS pictures and 30 matching AI-generated images were presented in random order, where each image was displayed for 3 seconds with neighboring images being separated by an interval of 2.8 to 3.5 seconds. Each experiment consisted of 10 recording sessions. The fMRI data was recorded on a 3T Siemens Prisma scanner. Pupil responses to image presentation were monitored using an MRI-compatible eyetracker. Our preliminary analysis of the fMRI data (N=3) showed that IAPS pictures and matching AI-generated images evoked similar neural responses in the visual cortex. In particular, MVPA (Multivariate Pattern Analysis) classifiers built to decode emotional categories from neural responses to IAPS pictures can be used to decode emotional categories from neural responses to AI-generated images and vice versa. Efforts to confirm these findings are underway by recruiting additional participants. Analysis is also being expanded to include the comparison of such measures as functional connectivity and pupillometry.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.