Dynamical neural model of lightness computation and perceptual fading of retinally stabilized images

We recently proposed a neural model that accounts to within <6% error for lightness matches made to Staircase Gelb and simultaneous contrast displays comprising real illuminated surfaces. Here, we demonstrate how the model accounts for the perceptual fading that occurs when images are stabilized on the retina (Troxler, 1804, Riggs et al., 1953). In the model, cortical lightness computations are derived from transient ON and OFF cell responses in the early visual system that are generated in the course of fixational eye movements. The ON and OFF responses are sorted by eye movement direction in visual cortex to produce a set of spatiotopic maps of ON and OFF activations. Activations within these maps trigger spatial filling-in of lightness and darkness within independent ON and OFF networks, which are combined at the final modeling stage to compute perceived reflectance (lightness). We elaborate these mechanisms to produce a more detailed neurophysiological theory. We propose how early temporal responses of ON and OFF cells are read out (decoded) in visual cortex to trigger lightness and darkness induction signals, and we explicitly model cortical magnification, which further improves the fit to psychophysical data. Two key takeaways are: 1) the model accounts for multiple lightness phenomena, including fading of stabilized images, with high quantitative precision and in a biologically plausible way; 2) estimated rates of fixational eye movements known as microsaccades (Martinez-Conde et al., 2004) are too low to explain the dynamics of lightness phenomenology. We suggest that the higher rate eye movements known as tremor can better account for the perceptual data within the context of an otherwise identical neural framework. Correspondences between the model's processing stages and cortical neurophysiology will be discussed, and the computations performed at different model stages will be illustrated through a combination of still images and movies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.980
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamical neural model of lightness computation and perceptual fading of retinally stabilized images

Michael E. Rudd, Idris Shareef
Journal of Vision
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Dynamical neural model of lightness computation and perceptual fading of retinally stabilized images

Michael E. Rudd, Idris Shareef
article en

Abstract

We recently proposed a neural model that accounts to within <6% error for lightness matches made to Staircase Gelb and simultaneous contrast displays comprising real illuminated surfaces. Here, we demonstrate how the model accounts for the perceptual fading that occurs when images are stabilized on the retina (Troxler, 1804, Riggs et al., 1953). In the model, cortical lightness computations are derived from transient ON and OFF cell responses in the early visual system that are generated in the course of fixational eye movements. The ON and OFF responses are sorted by eye movement direction in visual cortex to produce a set of spatiotopic maps of ON and OFF activations. Activations within these maps trigger spatial filling-in of lightness and darkness within independent ON and OFF networks, which are combined at the final modeling stage to compute perceived reflectance (lightness). We elaborate these mechanisms to produce a more detailed neurophysiological theory. We propose how early temporal responses of ON and OFF cells are read out (decoded) in visual cortex to trigger lightness and darkness induction signals, and we explicitly model cortical magnification, which further improves the fit to psychophysical data. Two key takeaways are: 1) the model accounts for multiple lightness phenomena, including fading of stabilized images, with high quantitative precision and in a biologically plausible way; 2) estimated rates of fixational eye movements known as microsaccades (Martinez-Conde et al., 2004) are too low to explain the dynamics of lightness phenomenology. We suggest that the higher rate eye movements known as tremor can better account for the perceptual data within the context of an otherwise identical neural framework. Correspondences between the model's processing stages and cortical neurophysiology will be discussed, and the computations performed at different model stages will be illustrated through a combination of still images and movies.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.