Scientific disclosure and corporate misconduct

This study examines the relationship between scientific disclosure and corporate misconduct. Through an analysis of comprehensive databases containing core journal publications and documented misconduct cases, we established a significant negative correlation between scientific disclosure and corporate misconduct. This association is particularly evident in firms with publications in English-language core journals. Our findings are corroborated by a series of rigorous robustness tests, including change analyses, instrumental variable estimation , Heckman's two-stage method, and the difference-in-differences approach. Moreover, our investigation into potential mechanisms reveals several pathways through which scientific disclosure may mitigate misconduct. These mechanisms include the attraction of high-quality talent, promotion of technological innovation, establishment of a positive reputation, acquisition of R&D subsidies, and deterrence of opportunistic corporate cultures. Ultimately, our results contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of corporate scientific disclosure in reducing misconduct and highlight the beneficial effects of corporate investment in scientific research. • Scientific disclosure reduces the likelihood of corporate misconduct. • Scientific disclosure is an important driving force for corporate innovation. • Scientific disclosure improves corporate transparency. • The Chinese government supports companies' scientific disclosure to reduce misconduct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102547
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific disclosure and corporate misconduct

Qianfeng Luo, Qifeng Zhao, Dongmin Kong
3 citations
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Academic integrity and plagiarism
1.58
article

Scientific disclosure and corporate misconduct

Qianfeng Luo, Qifeng Zhao, Dongmin Kong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between scientific disclosure and corporate misconduct. Through an analysis of comprehensive databases containing core journal publications and documented misconduct cases, we established a significant negative correlation between scientific disclosure and corporate misconduct. This association is particularly evident in firms with publications in English-language core journals. Our findings are corroborated by a series of rigorous robustness tests, including change analyses, instrumental variable estimation , Heckman's two-stage method, and the difference-in-differences approach. Moreover, our investigation into potential mechanisms reveals several pathways through which scientific disclosure may mitigate misconduct. These mechanisms include the attraction of high-quality talent, promotion of technological innovation, establishment of a positive reputation, acquisition of R&D subsidies, and deterrence of opportunistic corporate cultures. Ultimately, our results contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of corporate scientific disclosure in reducing misconduct and highlight the beneficial effects of corporate investment in scientific research. • Scientific disclosure reduces the likelihood of corporate misconduct. • Scientific disclosure is an important driving force for corporate innovation. • Scientific disclosure improves corporate transparency. • The Chinese government supports companies' scientific disclosure to reduce misconduct.

Pacific-Basin Finance JournalVol. 88
Institute of Quantitative and Technical Economics (CN), Rural Development Institute (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.