Is spacetime curved? Assessing the underdetermination of general relativity and teleparallel gravity

Abstract Realism about general relativity (GR) seems to imply realism about spacetime curvature. The existence of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) calls this into question, for (a) TEGR is set in a torsionful but flat spacetime, and (b) TEGR is empirically equivalent to GR. Knox (Stud Hist Philos Sci Part B Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 42(4):264–275, 2011) claims that there is no genuine underdetermination between GR and TEGR; we call this verdict into question by isolating and addressing her individual arguments. In addition, we anticipate and evaluate two further worries for realism about the torsionful spacetimes of TEGR, which we call the ‘problem of operationalisability’ and the ‘problem of visualisability’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04773-y
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is spacetime curved? Assessing the underdetermination of general relativity and teleparallel gravity

Ruward A. Mulder, James Read
4 citations
Synthese
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
1.33
article

Is spacetime curved? Assessing the underdetermination of general relativity and teleparallel gravity

Ruward A. Mulder, James Read
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Realism about general relativity (GR) seems to imply realism about spacetime curvature. The existence of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) calls this into question, for (a) TEGR is set in a torsionful but flat spacetime, and (b) TEGR is empirically equivalent to GR. Knox (Stud Hist Philos Sci Part B Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 42(4):264–275, 2011) claims that there is no genuine underdetermination between GR and TEGR; we call this verdict into question by isolating and addressing her individual arguments. In addition, we anticipate and evaluate two further worries for realism about the torsionful spacetimes of TEGR, which we call the ‘problem of operationalisability’ and the ‘problem of visualisability’.

SyntheseVol. 204(4)
University of Cambridge (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Leverhulme Trust, Trinity College, University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.