Chunking as an object: What comes together, goes together

When people have to remember several objects, they often employ grouping or chunking. The chunking does not only enhance memory precision but also introduces systematic biases for memorized items (e.g., attraction toward the gist of the display). While demonstrated for single-feature objects (e.g., orientation, shape, or color), it remains unclear how people chunk objects with multiple features. It could involve feature-level chunking, treating each feature separately, regardless of whether chunkable features belong to the same object. Alternatively, object-level chunking may occur, where grouping features within the same object improves chunking. Previous work investigated these hypotheses and found evidence of only feature-level chunking for multi-feature objects when both orientation and color were highly similar across all objects (Song & Chong, 2023). However, this work did not put feature and object cues into direct conflict to test their relative contributions. To test this, we ran a continuous report task where participants (N=44) had to remember 6 colored orientations and later report both the color and orientation of the probed item. In one condition, half of the stimuli were similar in colors but not orientations while the other half were similar in orientations but not colors. In another condition, half of the stimuli were similar in both colors and orientations, while the other 3 had random orientations and colors. Interestingly, when both features could be chunked for the same objects (i.e., the second condition), we found greater memory precision (F(43) = 17.22, p < 0.001) and stronger attraction bias (F(43) = 9.58, p < 0.005). Our results show that chunking can occur not only at a feature level but also at an object level. This prompts questions about the interaction of chunking at different levels and the potential existence of chunking at various levels of abstraction in working memory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.496
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chunking as an object: What comes together, goes together

Chaipat Chunharas, Timothy F. Brady, Chattarin Poungtubtim
Journal of Vision
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Chunking as an object: What comes together, goes together

Chaipat Chunharas, Timothy F. Brady, Chattarin Poungtubtim
article en

Abstract

When people have to remember several objects, they often employ grouping or chunking. The chunking does not only enhance memory precision but also introduces systematic biases for memorized items (e.g., attraction toward the gist of the display). While demonstrated for single-feature objects (e.g., orientation, shape, or color), it remains unclear how people chunk objects with multiple features. It could involve feature-level chunking, treating each feature separately, regardless of whether chunkable features belong to the same object. Alternatively, object-level chunking may occur, where grouping features within the same object improves chunking. Previous work investigated these hypotheses and found evidence of only feature-level chunking for multi-feature objects when both orientation and color were highly similar across all objects (Song & Chong, 2023). However, this work did not put feature and object cues into direct conflict to test their relative contributions. To test this, we ran a continuous report task where participants (N=44) had to remember 6 colored orientations and later report both the color and orientation of the probed item. In one condition, half of the stimuli were similar in colors but not orientations while the other half were similar in orientations but not colors. In another condition, half of the stimuli were similar in both colors and orientations, while the other 3 had random orientations and colors. Interestingly, when both features could be chunked for the same objects (i.e., the second condition), we found greater memory precision (F(43) = 17.22, p < 0.001) and stronger attraction bias (F(43) = 9.58, p < 0.005). Our results show that chunking can occur not only at a feature level but also at an object level. This prompts questions about the interaction of chunking at different levels and the potential existence of chunking at various levels of abstraction in working memory.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Chulalongkorn University (TH), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH), Universidad Católica Santo Domingo (DO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.