Variances in sensory eye dominance across the visual field

Sensory eye dominance refers to the functional asymmetry between the two eyes, where the data from each eye is unequally weighted within the binocular neural network. In this study, we systematically measured sensory eye dominance at the fovea and at 16 isoeccentric locations in visually normal observers. Sensory eye dominance was measured using a dichoptic signal-in-noise motion (left-right) discrimination task. In this task, coherently moving signal dots and randomly moving noise dots were presented dichoptically to each eye. Observers were asked to make a two-alternative forced-choice judgement of the net motion direction of the dots. The magnitude of eye dominance was quantified as the ratio of the coherence thresholds (signal-to-noise ratio) obtained when signal dots were presented to one eye versus the other. Sensory eye dominance was measured at the fovea (0°), 3°, and 6° eccentricities. At each eccentricity, eight concentric locations were examined, corresponding to polar angles of 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°, 225°, 270°, and 315°. Stimuli were scaled based on the cortical magnification factor. Results revealed that sensory eye dominance exhibited variation across the macular visual field. Specifically, individuals with relatively balanced eyes displayed variations in both the sign and magnitude of sensory eye dominance across the visual field. On the other hand, individuals with strong eye dominance tended to exhibit a consistent dominant eye, but with varying magnitudes of dominance observed across the visual field. Despite these variations, a significant correlation exists between sensory eye dominance in most tested locations, within observers. Our findings suggest that the degree of imbalance between the two eyes is not uniformly distributed across the visual field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.272
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variances in sensory eye dominance across the visual field

Ka Yee Kam, Dorita H. F. Chang
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Variances in sensory eye dominance across the visual field

Ka Yee Kam, Dorita H. F. Chang
article en

Abstract

Sensory eye dominance refers to the functional asymmetry between the two eyes, where the data from each eye is unequally weighted within the binocular neural network. In this study, we systematically measured sensory eye dominance at the fovea and at 16 isoeccentric locations in visually normal observers. Sensory eye dominance was measured using a dichoptic signal-in-noise motion (left-right) discrimination task. In this task, coherently moving signal dots and randomly moving noise dots were presented dichoptically to each eye. Observers were asked to make a two-alternative forced-choice judgement of the net motion direction of the dots. The magnitude of eye dominance was quantified as the ratio of the coherence thresholds (signal-to-noise ratio) obtained when signal dots were presented to one eye versus the other. Sensory eye dominance was measured at the fovea (0°), 3°, and 6° eccentricities. At each eccentricity, eight concentric locations were examined, corresponding to polar angles of 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°, 225°, 270°, and 315°. Stimuli were scaled based on the cortical magnification factor. Results revealed that sensory eye dominance exhibited variation across the macular visual field. Specifically, individuals with relatively balanced eyes displayed variations in both the sign and magnitude of sensory eye dominance across the visual field. On the other hand, individuals with strong eye dominance tended to exhibit a consistent dominant eye, but with varying magnitudes of dominance observed across the visual field. Despite these variations, a significant correlation exists between sensory eye dominance in most tested locations, within observers. Our findings suggest that the degree of imbalance between the two eyes is not uniformly distributed across the visual field.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.