2024 HRS perspective on advancing workflows for CIED remote monitoring

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) generate substantial data, often stored in image or PDF formats. Remote monitoring, now an integral component of patient care, places considerable administrative burdens on clinicians and staff, in large part due to the challenge of integrating these data seamlessly into electronic health records. Since 2006, the Heart Rhythm Society, in collaboration with the CIED industry, has led an initiative to establish a unified standard nomenclature. This effort has harmonized terminology, aligning diverse terms with single terms approved by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. With this foundational work complete, attention now turns to developing technical standards for interoperability, which would enable the smooth communication of CIED data between information technology systems used in clinical practice. In this article, by leveraging Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources, we present a road map for the technical committee to guide this endeavor. We identify critical data exchange points between remote transceivers, electronic health records, and third-party platforms commonly used for CIED patient data management. Our objective is to establish bidirectional communication among these resources, ensuring the accuracy, timeliness, and accessibility of clinical data for clinicians. We also anticipate substantial benefits for both clinical research and administrative efficiency through the implementation of this interoperability framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heart Rhythm O2
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.012
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2024 HRS perspective on advancing workflows for CIED remote monitoring

Robert I. Lerman, R. Taber Michael, Elaine Y. Wan, David J. Slotwiner et al.
5 citations
Heart Rhythm O2
Electronic Health Records Systems
3.54
article

2024 HRS perspective on advancing workflows for CIED remote monitoring

Robert I. Lerman, R. Taber Michael, Elaine Y. Wan, David J. Slotwiner, P. Steiner, Ratika Parkash, Julien Durand, Deepak Bhakta, Martha Ferrara, G. Stuart Mendenhall, Neal Lippman, Gerald A. Serwer, Jørgen Johansen, Matthew Kalscheur, Craig Reister, Dennis Krisjnen, Andy Iverson, Nicholas T Skipitaris, Manish Wadhwa, Marko Tietz, Chris Irving, Harry Solomon, Maobing Jin, Jason Hale, Noemi Ray, Richard Clark, James Allred, Steven Nichols
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) generate substantial data, often stored in image or PDF formats. Remote monitoring, now an integral component of patient care, places considerable administrative burdens on clinicians and staff, in large part due to the challenge of integrating these data seamlessly into electronic health records. Since 2006, the Heart Rhythm Society, in collaboration with the CIED industry, has led an initiative to establish a unified standard nomenclature. This effort has harmonized terminology, aligning diverse terms with single terms approved by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. With this foundational work complete, attention now turns to developing technical standards for interoperability, which would enable the smooth communication of CIED data between information technology systems used in clinical practice. In this article, by leveraging Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources, we present a road map for the technical committee to guide this endeavor. We identify critical data exchange points between remote transceivers, electronic health records, and third-party platforms commonly used for CIED patient data management. Our objective is to establish bidirectional communication among these resources, ensuring the accuracy, timeliness, and accessibility of clinical data for clinicians. We also anticipate substantial benefits for both clinical research and administrative efficiency through the implementation of this interoperability framework.

Heart Rhythm O2Vol. 5(12)
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Dalhousie University (CA), Northwell Health (US), Louisiana State University of Alexandria (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Central Oregon Community College (US), California State University, Northridge (US), University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), General Electric (Spain) (ES), Cornell University (US), Lenox Hill Hospital (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), Odense University Hospital (DK), Boston Scientific (United States) (US), MicroPort Orthopedics (Netherlands) (NL), Medtronic (United States) (US), Abbott (Canada) (CA), White Plains Hospital (US), Scripps Memorial Hospital (US), Philips (United States) (US), Santa Cruz County Office of Education (US), C. S. Mott Children's Hospital (US), Dedicon (NL), Biotronik (Germany) (DE), Indiana University School of Medicine, Hartford Financial Services (United States), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Columbia University (US), Biotronik (Switzerland) (CH)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Electronic Health Records Systems
3.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.